[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.176.107. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]

November 2016 - July 1883

Decade

Year

Issue

July 15, 1998, Vol 280, No. 3, Pages 207-306 | Peer Review

This Week in JAMA

This Week in JAMA

Abstract Full Text
JAMA. 1998;280(3):207-207. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.207
Editorial

Congress on Biomedical Peer ReviewHistory, Ethics, and Plans for the Future

Abstract Full Text
JAMA. 1998;280(3):213-213. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.213

Peer Review in Prague

Abstract Full Text
JAMA. 1998;280(3):214-215. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.214
The Cover

Le Philosophe

Abstract Full Text
JAMA. 1998;280(3):210-210. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.210
JAMA 100 Years Ago

THE JOURNAL AND ITS FRIENDS.

Abstract Full Text
JAMA. 1998;280(3):302D. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.302

THE JOURNAL AND THE ASSOCIATION.

Abstract Full Text
JAMA. 1998;280(3):302D. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.302D-JJY80022-2-1
JAMA Patient Page
Continuing Medical Education

July 15, 1998July 15, 1998

Abstract Full Text
JAMA. 1998;280(3):303-304. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.303
Peer Review Congress

AuthorshipThe Coin of the Realm, The Source of Complaints

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):216-217. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.216

What Are the Factors Determining Authorship and the Order of the Authors' Names?A Study Among Authors of the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (Dutch Journal of Medicine)

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):217-218. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.217

Multiple AuthorshipThe Contribution of Senior Authors

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):219-221. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.219

Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):222-224. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.222

Financial Interest and Its Disclosure in Scientific Publications

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):225-226. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.225

Changes to Manuscripts During the Editorial ProcessCharacterizing the Evolution of a Clinical Paper

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):227-228. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.227

Reliability of Editors' Subjective Quality Ratings of Peer Reviews of Manuscripts

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):229-231. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.229

What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):231-233. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.231

Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer ReviewA Randomized Trial

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):234-237. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.234

Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their ReportsA Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):237-240. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.237

Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality?A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):240-242. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.240

Masking Author Identity in Peer ReviewWhat Factors Influence Masking Success?

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):243-245. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.243

US and Non-US SubmissionsAn Analysis of Reviewer Bias

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):246-247. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.246

Adherence to Published Standards of ReportingA Comparison of Placebo-Controlled Trials Published in English or German

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):247-249. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.247

Publication Bias and Research on Passive SmokingComparison of Published and Unpublished Studies

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):250-253. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.250

Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):254-257. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.254

Unpublished Research From a Medical Specialty MeetingWhy Investigators Fail to Publish

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):257-259. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.257

Is There a Sex Bias in Choosing Editors?Epidemiology Journals as an Example

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):260-264. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.260

Reviewing the ReviewsThe Example of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):264-266. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.264

Can the Accuracy of Abstracts Be Improved by Providing Specific Instructions?A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):267-269. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.267

Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trial Descriptors and Use of Structured Abstracts

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):269-272. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.269

Perceived Value of Providing Peer Reviewers With Abstracts and Preprints of Related Published and Unpublished Papers

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):273-274. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.273

Evaluating the BMJ Guidelines for Economic SubmissionsProspective Audit of Economic Submissions to BMJ and The Lancet

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):275-277. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.275

Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysesA Comparison of Cochrane Reviews With Articles Published in Paper-Based Journals

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):278-280. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.278

Discussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical JournalsIslands in Search of Continents?

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):280-282. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.280

Research Design and Statistical Methods in Chinese Medical Journals

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):283-285. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.283

The Reported Training and Experience of Editors in Chief of Specialist Clinical Medical Journals

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):286-287. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.286

A Comparison of the Opinions of Experts and Readers as to What Topics a General Medical Journal (JAMA ) Should Address

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):288-290. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.288

Ethical Issues in Studying Submissions to a Medical Journal

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):290-291. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.290

Peer-Reviewed Articles and Public HealthThe Mad Cow Affair in Italian Newspapers

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):292-294. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.292

Press Releases of Science Journal Articles and Subsequent Newspaper Stories on the Same Topic

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):294-295. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.294

Phenomena of RetractionReasons for Retraction and Citations to the Publications

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):296-297. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.296

The Journal OmbudspersonA Step Toward Scientific Press Oversight

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):298-299. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.298

Freedom and Responsibility in Medical PublicationSetting the Balance Right

Abstract Full Text
free access
JAMA. 1998;280(3):300-302. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.300
×