Why has stem cell therapy not been routinely implemented in patients with cardiovascular disease and how can this barrier be changed?
One of the barriers facing the routine implementation of stem cell therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease is the limited and inconsistent benefit seen thus far; many studies have shown that poor cell retention and survival is a contributing factor. Strategies to better understand and address this limitation include incorporating imaging to determine cell fate into clinical trials, delivering cells with adjuvant agents, or embedding cells into tissue engineering constructs.
For stem cell therapy to achieve significant clinical efficacy in patients with cardiovascular disease, strategies to improve cell survival and retention must be identified.
Although progress continues to be made in the field of stem cell regenerative medicine for the treatment of cardiovascular disease, significant barriers to clinical implementation still exist.
To summarize the current barriers to the clinical implementation of stem cell therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease and to discuss potential strategies to overcome them.
Information for this review was obtained through a search of PubMed and the Cochrane database for English-language studies published between January 1, 2000, and July 25, 2016. Ten randomized clinical trials and 8 systematic reviews were included.
One of the major clinical barriers facing the routine implementation of stem cell therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease is the limited and inconsistent benefit observed thus far. Reasons for this finding are unclear but may be owing to poor cell retention and survival, as suggested by numerous preclinical studies and a small number of human studies incorporating imaging to determine cell fate. Additional studies in humans using imaging to determine cell fate are needed to understand how these factors contribute to the limited efficacy of stem cell therapy. Treatment strategies to address poor cell retention and survival are under investigation and include the following: coadministration of immunosuppressive and prosurvival agents, delivery of cardioprotective factors packaged in exosomes rather than the cells themselves, and use of tissue-engineering strategies to provide structural support for cells. If larger grafts are achieved using these strategies, it will be imperative to carefully monitor for the potential risks of tumorigenicity, immunogenicity, and arrhythmogenicity.
Conclusions and Relevance
Despite important achievements to date, stem cell therapy is not yet ready for routine clinical implementation. Significant research is still needed to address the clinical barriers outlined herein before the next wave of large clinical trials is under way.
Nguyen PK, Neofytou E, Rhee J, Wu JC. Potential Strategies to Address the Major Clinical Barriers Facing Stem Cell Regenerative Therapy for Cardiovascular DiseaseA Review. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(8):953-962. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2016.2750