[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 280
Citations 0
In This Issue of JAMA Cardiology
December 2016


JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(9):969. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2015.0050

To examine whether participation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is associated with health status after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), Kureshi and coauthors studied 4929 patients in the PREMIER and TRIUMPH study registries. Health status was assessed with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire and the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey at 6 and 12 months after AMI. Those who did and did not participate in CR had similar reported health status during the year following AMI; however, participation in CR did confer a significant survival benefit (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46-0.75). These findings underscore the need for increased use of validated patient-reported outcome measures to further examine if and how health status can be maximized for patients who participate in CR. In an editorial, Jneid points out that only 41% of patients in this study were referred for CR, highlighting the need for more research to identify and overcome barriers leading to underuse of CR.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview