[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.207.116. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Commentary
ONLINE FIRST
Sep 2012

Post–California Tanning BanA Brief Update on Current Youth Access Laws

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Arch Dermatol. 2012;148(9):1071-1072. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2012.2085

Nearly a quarter of US adolescents have reported using indoor tanning. The reasons stated for tanning include a desire to achieve a tanned appearance, to socialize and improve their mood, or to relax.1 Safety concerns surround the addictive nature of tanning, as well as the increased risk for skin cancers, skin aging, and immunosuppression due to the exposure of UV radiation.2 As a consequence, there has been an alarming rise in melanoma incidence, especially in young women ages 15 to 39 years.3 Indeed, it has been shown that tanning bed use increases the risk of melanoma by 75% when use occurs before age 35 years.4 In response to these alarming trends, numerous health and medical organizations have characterized tanning beds as carcinogenic and encouraged increasing state regulations to limit youth access to tanning salons.4 In February 2012, California became the first state to implement a universal tanning ban for minors younger than 18 years. In light of this instrumental piece of legislation, this commentary serves to delineate the current status of tanning access restrictions and describe the challenges in the legislative path to “ban the tan.”

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×