THE JOURNAL OF CUTANEOUS DISEASES
* * *
It is well known that the existence of successive syphilitic chancres has been denied by several authors, and it has been claimed that in the various cases reported, there has been synchronous evolution of the lesions, but that mistakes have occurred from lack of care and acumen in observation. In answer to this claim Sabareanu shows conclusively that as the result of experimental inoculation made mostly in the days when syphilization was practiced. . . .
EDITORIALEVOLUTION OF THE INITIAL SYPHILITIC LESION OR LESIONS IN SUCCESSIVE CROPS (Chancres Syphilitiques Successifs). Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(12):1503. doi:10.1001/archderm.141.12.1503