[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.129.96. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Correspondence
November 2002

Questionable Techniques for Evaluating Photodamage

Author Affiliations

Not Available

Arch Dermatol. 2002;138(11):1515. doi:10.1001/archderm.138.11.1515

The article titled "Tazarotene Cream for the Treatment of Facial Photodamage" in the December 2001 issue of the ARCHIVES1 is far removed from the standards of evidence-based medicine. There are missing data, numerical juggling, and selective reporting of data.

In the authors' summary, percentage success rates are based on "global response," a measure that involved the investigator's memory. At each visit, evaluators compared the subject's condition with their recall of the subject's appearance at baseline and scored this on a 7-point scale. Is it realistic to expect an investigator to remember what the subject's skin looked like 6 months ago?

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×