[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
May 1970


Author Affiliations

US Army Hospital, Fort Gordon, Ga 30905

Arch Dermatol. 1970;101(5):620. doi:10.1001/archderm.1970.04000050124024

To the Editor.—  The lesions in the excellent clinical photograph in the recent article by Dr. Kenneth M. Lloyd1 are identical with perineal lesions of the patient presented by Dr. Paul Hirsh and myself in the December 1969, Society Transactions. In our patient fluorouracil also was of no value, even after increasing the concentration and number of applications per day, requiring surgical excision under general anesthesia.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview