[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.159.197.114. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 1974

Mercury Allergy and Patch Testing-Reply

Arch Dermatol. 1974;109(1):98-99. doi:10.1001/archderm.1974.01630010070027

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor.—  Dr. Epstein's letter calls attention to an important question: What factor explains a 22.2% incidence of positive patch test reactions to mercury bichloride? In our article, we stressed that most of the reactions elicited in our selected group of patients were of low intensity, and that patients with such mild reactions probably were not "clinically" sensitive. In view of the low (0.05%) concentration of mercury bichloride used in our tests (rather than the standard 0.1% concentration), we considered it unlikely that the reactions were due to primary irritant effects. Dr. Epstein, on the other hand, favor the latter possibility.Black, MD, in Auckland, New Zealand (written communication, Sept 5, 1973), found that, of 25 contact allergens tested, mercuric chloride in a 0.1% concentration elicited the highest percentage (14%) of reactions among his 215 patients. However, in only one of the 30 positively reacting patients was there a

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×