[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
April 1974

Incorrect References

Author Affiliations

San Jose, Calif

Arch Dermatol. 1974;109(4):571. doi:10.1001/archderm.1974.01630040075024

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor.—  In their usually persuasive manner, Drs. Ayres and Mihan, while extolling their results with vitamin E, refer in passing to the infiltration method advocated by Ervin Epstein, MD, in their letter to the editor in the Archives (108:855,1973). But the formula of Dr. Epstein, while correctly listed in the title of the reference (Calif Med 115:6, 1971), is incorrectly described as triamcinolone in lidocaine (Xylocaine), whereas the reference actually reads triamcinolone in procaine.While this may be thought to be "nit-picking," my experiences both in Israel and in California, have revealed important differences between the uses of lidocaine or procaine with the triamcinolone. Incorrect references in science may lead to incorrect assumptions, and this may be the case here, since Drs. Ayres and Mihan appear not to be overly impressed with the results of Dr. Epstein's method. Perhaps their confusion about the procaine is the answer.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview