[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 1979

Gram-Negative Folliculitis Without Systemic Antibiotics?

Author Affiliations

Santa Rosa, Calif

San Francisco

Arch Dermatol. 1979;115(6):676. doi:10.1001/archderm.1979.04010060002007

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor.—  It has been assumed that acne-related Gram-negative folliculitis is secondary to systemic antibiotic acne therapy. We have observed several patients with Gram-negative folliculitis in whom we cannot obtain a history of systemic antibiotic therapy.A 16-year-old boy was first seen on Aug 31, 1977, with cystic acne of the face and back. Therapy was instituted with cleansers, 2% clindamycin lotion, and ultraviolet light. Benzoyl peroxide gel (5%) was subsequently added. In January 1978, clindamycin therapy was discontinued and 2% erythromycin lotion substituted. Only moderate improvement was noted. For these reasons, cultures were performed, revealing Escherichia coli from pus from his face; subsequently repeated several times, cultures continued to show heavy growth of E coli from pus and anterior nares.Does this represent Gram-negative folliculitis secondary to one of the three topical antimicrobials (clindamycin, erythromycin, and benzoyl peroxide), or occult systemic antibiotic exposure? Or can this process occur

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×