[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.90.95. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
September 1980

Verrucous Carcinoma-Reply

Author Affiliations

Rochester, Minn

Arch Dermatol. 1980;116(9):987. doi:10.1001/archderm.1980.01640330025006

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.—  We read with interest the comments made by Drs Brodin and Mehregan regarding our diagnosis of VC in the case cited. Part of the difficulty revolves about the issue of what constitutes the spectrum of VC. Most authors refer to it as SCC, despite its relative lack of anaplasia. However, this is often the case in other types of SCCs such as keratoacanthoma, oral florid papillomatosis, and Buschke-Löwenstein tumors. If a lesion such as VC is thought of as a type of SCC, why cannot a lesion with the histologic characteristics of SCC be referred to as VC if the clinical features are appropriate?As with most disease processes, several factors must be taken into account before making a diagnosis. To exclude this lesion as a case of VC solely on the basis of the degree of cellular pleomorphism may not be useful. Clinically, the lesions in the

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×