[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.92.62. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 1984

Diagnostic UltrasoundA Review of the State of the Art

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Northwestern University Medical School and Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago.

Arch Dermatol. 1984;120(2):248-253. doi:10.1001/archderm.1984.01650380108024
Abstract

While a number of new imaging techniques have been introduced during the last few years, diagnostic ultrasound has proved to be one of the most clinically useful. The technique involves the use of high frequency, relatively low intensity sound waves for imaging of deep organs of the body.

Two formats of information are obtained by ultrasound. Static image scanners create a single, large field-of-view image of a portion of the anatomy, whereas real-time scanners produce a live-action or fluoroscopiclike image. The latter technique has the advantage of ease of operation and visualization of dynamic activity and the disadvantage of a smaller field of view than conventional "B-scan" or staticimage scans.

Both techniques use similar instrumentation, beginning with a transducer that "rings" with a characteristic frequency when a voltage is applied. For conventional diagnostic purposes, frequencies in the range of 2.5 to 7.5 million cps (megahertz) are used. The audible range

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×