[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.176.107. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 1987

Condylomata Acuminata in the Evaluation of Child Sexual Abuse-Reply

Author Affiliations

Department of Dermatology University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455

Arch Dermatol. 1987;123(10):1266. doi:10.1001/archderm.1987.01660340026003
Abstract

In Reply.—  I would like to respond to the letter by Dr Goldenring regarding anogenital warts in children. I am in basic agreement with many comments made by Dr Goldenring. Clearly, any child presenting with warts found perirectally, perivaginally, periurethrally, or on the penis must be strongly suspected as being a sexual abuse victim. One must, however, consider the possibility that a neonate less than 1 year old acquired his or her anogenital warts from a mother infected with human papillomavirus at the time of delivery.1Dr Goldenring apparently believes that the validity of the article by Krzyzek et al2 is in doubt. In this article, human papillomaviruses types 1 through 3 were found in adult anogenital warts. Since types 1 through 3 are routinely found in common and plantar warts, the question arises whether wart virus transmission from nonvenereal warts to genital skin occurs with significant frequency.Dr Harold

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×