[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
July 1990

Did They See Mites?-Reply

Author Affiliations

Harborview Medical Center, ZA89 325 Ninth Ave Seattle, WA 98104

Arch Dermatol. 1990;126(7):967. doi:10.1001/archderm.1990.01670310130026

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


In Reply.—  Because the clinical presentation of scabies and the appearance of lesions are variable, we chose not to devote several lines of text to all the variations on the clinical lesions that we saw. The large majority of patients had papular lesions, often with an eczematous component or visible burrows, occurring most commonly in typical anatomic areas (eg, finger webs, genitals, extensor surfaces of the elbows). Dr Clayman apparently failed to note that the diagnosis was confirmed by microscopic demonstration of mites, ova, or fecal droppings in 81% of the patients. Moreover, the clinical responses to permethrin and lindane were virtually identical in the subjects with and without microscopic confirmation (as shown in Table 2 of our article), supporting our belief that the clinical diagnosis was accurate in the unconfirmed cases.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview