[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 1993

Floor-Pattern Salt-Split Skin Cannot Distinguish Bullous Pemphigoid From Epidermolysis Bullosa AcquisitaUse of Toad Skin

Author Affiliations

From the National Skin Centre, Singapore (Drs Pang and Ratnam); and Department of Pathology, National University of Singapore (Dr Lee).

Arch Dermatol. 1993;129(6):744-746. doi:10.1001/archderm.1993.01680270082010
Abstract

• Background and Design.—  Patients with epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) and bullous pemphigoid (BP) can present with similar clinical features. These antigens have different phylogenetic origins. It was thought that sodium chloride split-skin immunofluorescence could reliably distinguish between BP and EBA. However, it has now been recognized that both diseases can present with a floor pattern fluorescence on salt-split skin. A simple method is required to distinguish these diseases.

Results.—  Serum specimens from two patients presenting with pruritic blisters showing a floor pattern immunofluorescence on salt-split skin were found to have positive fluorescence on toad skin that has the BP and not the EBA antigen. The diagnosis of BP in these patients was confirmed by a prompt response to treatment with systemic steroids. Electron microscopy showed a split at the lamina lucida.

Conclusions.—  Bullous pemphigoid can present with a floor pattern immunofluorescence on salt-split skin. The use of the skin from invertebrates like the toad may help in distinguishing BP from EBA.(Arch Dermatol. 1993;129:744-746)

×