[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.175.236. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 1993

The Sensitivity and Specificity of the Potassium Hydroxide Smear-Reply

Author Affiliations

Department of Microbiology Division of Infectious Diseases The Sir Mortimer B. Davis— Jewish General Hospital 3755 Cemin De La Cote— Ste Catherine Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3T 1E2

Arch Dermatol. 1993;129(10):1342-1343. doi:10.1001/archderm.1993.01680310114025
Abstract

In reply  I thank Dr Salomon for his comments on our findings regarding the operating characteristics of the potassium hydroxide smear. I wholeheartedly agree that even "simple" laboratory tests that have been in place for many years need to be evaluated objectively. Dr Salomon's belief regarding the reliability of the potassium hydroxide smear is widely held, yet not substantiated by data presented by us or others.1 Indeed, this belief was the impetus for the study. His comment about the test performance being affected by the individual performing the test merits commentary. Training is a key element for anyone performing a diagnostic test (physician or otherwise). However, the clinical findings preceding a test are irrelevant for the actual assessment of the test's sensitivity and specificity as performed by a trained individual. In fact, unbiased assessments of a diagnostic test are essential for accurate determination of the test's clinical worth.2

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×