[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.166.5.76. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 1995

Pseudolymphoma?-Reply

Author Affiliations

Department of Dermatology Hospital Universitario San Carlos Zurbano 25 28010 Madrid, Spain

Arch Dermatol. 1995;131(2):226. doi:10.1001/archderm.1995.01690140112022

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

We appreciate the comments by Dr Cerroni concerning our article; we know of his expertise in the field of immunophenotyping of cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders. The expression of some T-cell—associated antigens by B lymphocytes is a frequent and useful criterion to identify some B lymphocytes, both in frozen and in paraffin-embedded sections.

Let us supply some further histologic data. Our immunohistochemical studies were performed on paraffinembedded sections with the following antibodies: Mtl, UCHL1, L26, MB-2, and antiκ and antiλ light chains. More than 90% of lymphoid cells were positive for anti—T-cell antibodies (MT1 and UCHL1); less than 10% were positive forantiB-cell antibodies (126 and MB-2). Normal-appearing plasma cells, containing both κ and λ light chains, were scattered throughout the infiltrate, mainly in the periphery of the nodules. Histiocytic cells, not reactive with the above= mentioned antibodies, formed eccentrically situated groups within the nodules.

These data, and those previously mentioned, prompt us

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×