[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.175.236. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 1995

Cultures of Skin Biopsy Tissue From Immunocompromised Patients With Cancer and Rashes

Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Dermatology (The Skin Diseases Research Center) (Dr Chren) and Medicine (Drs Lazarus, Salata, and Landefeld), University Hospitals of Cleveland, and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, and the Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Departments of Dermatology [Dr Chren] and Medicine [Drs Salata and Landefeld]), Cleveland, Ohio.

Arch Dermatol. 1995;131(5):552-555. doi:10.1001/archderm.1995.01690170054007
Abstract

Background and Design:  Microbiological cultures of skin biopsy tissue are often recommended in immunocompromised patients with cancer and rashes, but in a previous study, they were usually sterile or grew clinically insignificant organisms. To examine the use and bacteriological results of these cultures more comprehensively, we reviewed records from all immunocompromised adults with cancer and acute rash on which skin biopsy was performed during 39 months on a bone marrow transplantation/acute leukemia unit of a university hospital (108 episodes of rash in 80 patients).

Results:  Of the 158 cultures that were performed, one (1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0% to 4%] ) was a true positive; 11 (7%; 95% CI, 3% to 13%) were false positive; 143 (91%; 95% CI, 87% to 95%) were true negative; and three (2%; 95% CI, 1% to 6%) were false negative. Thus, the sensitivity of culture was 0.25, and the specificity was 0.93. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the single pathogenic organism that grew, yet was judged to be a contaminant in three episodes. Among the 95 rashes in which fewer than four types of culture were performed, viral culture may have been helpful in one case (1%; 95% CI, 0% to 6%).

Conclusions:  Cultures of skin tissue from immunocompromised cancer patients with rashes were often unable to diagnose infection or the absence of infection. Clinical judgment was crucial to the interpretation of culture results.(Arch Dermatol. 1995;131:552-555)

×