[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.65.227. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
July 1997

Fibroepithelial Polyps and Pathologic Evaluation-Reply

Author Affiliations

Indiana University School of Medicine Department of Dermatology 550 N University Blvd, Suite 4544 Indianapolis, IN 46202

Arch Dermatol. 1997;133(7):915-916. doi:10.1001/archderm.1997.03890430137024

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

We want to thank Brodell and Pokorney for raising some important questions emerging from our study. Their first concern was the potential establishment of restrictive policies by insurance or managed care companies to prohibit payment for the removal and pathologic examination of fibro-epithelial polyps. We concur that establishment of such a policy based solely on this study might not be in the best interest of our patients. First, our study did demonstrate a difference in the rate of malignancy depending on the specialty of the physician clinically diagnosing the lesion. Therefore, any mandated policy would have to take this difference into account and articulate why payment would be restricted for one type of physician and not for another. Second, the intent of our study was to ascertain the degree of diagnostic accuracy of physicians who were excising clinically typical fibroepithelial polyps, not to set policy. We were quite pleased to

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×