Frühauf J, Schwantzer G, Ambros-Rudolph CM, Weger W, Ahlgrimm-Siess V, Salmhofer W, Hofmann-Wellenhof R. Pilot Study Using Teledermatology to Manage High-Need Patients With Psoriasis. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(2):200-201. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2009.375
Patient empowerment has been found to be a key factor for achieving improved health outcomes in psoriasis.1 Telemedicine has revolutionized some aspects of health care delivery by transforming relationships between patients and physicians, shifting the power of consultation so that patients may become more informed and assertive.2 However, the greater confidence of dermatologists when making the diagnosis by in-person examinations3 may have impeded the routine use of teledermatology until now. The present study provides baseline data on the feasibility of teledermatology services for high-need patients with psoriasis, preparing the way for further effectiveness studies.
After approval was granted by the institutional review board at the Medical University of Graz, Austria, and informed written consent was obtained, patients with psoriasis who met the inclusion criteria (men or women, age ≥18 years, eligible for etanercept treatment,4 and able to use mobile phones) were prospectively enrolled in the 12-week pilot study. Etanercept treatment was administered according to standard protocol.4
Patients were given and trained on a general packet radio services/universal mobile telecommunications system (GPRS/UMTS)–enabled Smartphone (Nokia 6630; Nokia, Helsinki, Finland) with a 1.3-megapixel camera and special software that integrated both a section for capturing images and a section for the input of historical information, including occurrence of adverse effects or skin lesions in regions inaccessible to the camera (eg, the scalp) or not usually photographed (eg, the genitalia). Patients photographed their skin lesions according to the anatomic areas of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) or Palmoplantar PASI (PASI/PPPASI).5 The data were transmitted through GPRS/UMTS to a Web server at weeks 0, 1, 2, and every 2 weeks thereafter. Treatment instructions were sent via e-mail-to–short message service techniques to the patients' phones within 24 hours.
Data from routine outpatient consultations at weeks 0, 1, 6, and 12 were compared with those obtained by 2 teledermatologists (TD1 and TD2) with particular attention to the accuracy of PASI/PPPASI scores and therapeutic outcome assessments (≥50% reduction from baseline PASI/PPPASI scores [PASI/PPPASI 50] at week 12).4 Based on the face-to-face assessments (FTF), PASI/PPPASI 50 responders were continued on etanercept treatment regimens.
All eligible patients (6 men and 4 women; median age, 40 years; age range, 25-67 years) agreed to participate in the study. Eight patients had plaque psoriasis, and 2 presented with palmoplantar psoriasis. Each of the 10 patients transmitted 8 “mobile visits” (total, 80 visits) including 32 to 64 images each (total, 486). Image quality was very good for an average of 86% of the images (range, 66%-95%); satisfactory for 12% (range, 5%-28%); and poor for 2% (range, 0%-6%).
The PASI/PPPASI scores correlated significantly between the FTF and the 2 teledermatologists (r = 0.71-0.96 for TD1 and r = 0.78-0.98 for TD2) (Table) as well as between the 2 teledermatologists (r = 0.93) (P < .001). The interrater variability (mean PASI/PPPASI deviation from FTF) was very low for both teledermatologists, with values ranging from 0.86 to 3.39. For patient outcomes, TD1 agreed 8 of 10 times with FTF (κ = 0.52), and TD2 agreed with FTF 9 of 10 times (κ = 0.78). Therapeutic outcome marginally differed in 2 patients. In one case, FTF assessed a PASI/PPPASI 50, while the teledermatologists found a 44% (TD1) and 24% (TD2) PASI/PPPASI improvement from baseline to week 12. In the other case, TD1 calculated a PASI/PPPASI 50, while TD2 found a 47% and FTF a 44% PASI/PPPASI improvement. Palmoplantar psoriasis ratings were completely concordant.
For the first time, to our knowledge, we have assessed the feasibility of a patient-driven mobile home-monitoring system for high-need patients with psoriasis, which actively integrates them into their treatment process. We have demonstrated a strong correlation between severity measurements obtained by an FTF physician and teledermatologists (Table) and a good concordance of PASI/PPPASI 50 assessments and management decisions. Because severity scorings differed mainly in diverse estimations of the involved area and induration of the lesions, one may speculate that the divergence might have resulted from the inability of the teledermatologists to see the entire body and to palpate the lesions, or it might have resulted from some flaws of the PASI scoring system for which an interrater variability of up to 8.1 PASI scores has been described.5
In our study, the interrater variability was very low (Table), indicating that mobile teledermatology is a feasible method for monitoring disease severity in patients with psoriasis. Larger controlled studies are required to evaluate the impact of remote follow-up care on patient empowerment and its influence on the therapeutic outcome.
Correspondence: Dr Frühauf, Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 8, A-8036 Graz, Austria (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Author Contributions: Drs Frühauf and Hofmann-Wellenhof and Mr Schwantzer had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Frühauf. Acquisition of data: Weger, Ahlgrimm-Siess, and Salmhofer. Analysis and interpretation of data: Schwantzer, Ambros-Rudolph, and Hofmann-Wellenhof. Drafting of the manuscript: Frühauf. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Schwantzer, Ambros-Rudolph, Weger, Ahlgrimm-Siess, Salmhofer, and Hofmann-Wellenhof. Statistical analysis: Frühauf and Schwantzer. Study supervision: Hofmann-Wellenhof.
Financial Disclosure: None reported.
Additional Contributions: We are indebted to Joanneum Research (research institution in Austria).