[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Invited Commentary
Sept/Oct 2015

Comparing Methods for Repair of the External ValveOne More Step Toward a Unified View of Lateral Wall Insufficiency

Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of Facial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015;17(5):345-346. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2015.0790

In the current issue, Barham and colleagues1 present data comparing 2 techniques for repair of external valve dysfunction (EVD). These data represent the latest in a line of new studies designed to examine treatments for EVD using various quality-of-life (QOL) instruments, objective measurements of the nasal airway, physician-derived measurements, or some combination thereof.2 In particular, this study is the latest to include the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire as part of its analysis of patient-reported outcomes.3 Over the past 10 years, the NOSE scale has been a mainstay of many studies of functional rhinoplasty maneuvers.25 Barham and colleagues are correct that correlation between objection measures of the nasal airway, clinician findings, and patient-reported findings often do not correlate, as pointed out nicely by Lam et al.6 To that end, they note similar findings in the current study.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview