[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.120.181. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 174
Citations 0
Comment & Response
Mar/Apr 2016

Use of FACE-Q to Measure Quality of Life Following Aesthetic Facial Treatments

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  • 2Modus Outcomes, Stotfold, England
  • 3Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016;18(2):148-149. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2016.0001

To the Editor We commend Jacono and colleagues1 for using a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in their study, adding to the body of evidence-based outcomes data for facial aesthetics treatments. We have concerns, though, about their choice of PROM. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale (RSES) is a legacy scale, published in 1965 after testing in more than 5000 US high school students. Jacono and colleagues1 found no change in self-esteem in 50 patients 6 months after a face-lift. This was not a surprise; self-esteem is a relatively stable construct.2 What was a surprise was the authors’ choice to use a generic rather than cosmetic-surgery specific PROM.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×