Copyright 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.2002
Ross EV, Miller C, Meehan K, McKinlay J, Sajben P, Trafeli JP, Barnette DJ
Dermatol Surg. 2001;27:709-715
Background: The CO2 laser is normally described as an aggressive resurfacing tool, whereas the erbium:YAG laser has enjoyed a reputation as the ideal tool for superficial resurfacing. The implication from many studies is that the CO2 laser is incapable of "minimally invasive" resurfacing.
Objective: To compare a short-pulsed CO2 laser with an Er:YAG laser over a range of parameters intended to produce equivalent microscopic and clinical injuries.
Alster TS. One-Pass CO2 Versus Multiple-Pass Er:YAG Laser Resurfacing in the Treatment of Rhytides: A Comparison Side-by-Side Study of Pulsed CO2 and Er:YAG Lasers. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2002;4(4):273-274. doi: