[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.159.202.12. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Editor's Correspondence
March 2007

Comparing Apples to Oranges in Meta-analysis Studies

Author Affiliations

Correspondence: Dr Rhee, Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, MCW Clinic at Froedtert West, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (jrhee@mcw.edu).

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007;9(2):139-140. doi:10.1001/archfaci.9.2.139-b

Correspondence: Dr Rhee, Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, MCW Clinic at Froedtert West, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (jrhee@mcw.edu).

As an avid proponent of evidence-based medicine, I read with great interest the recent article by Leventhal et al.1 I laud the efforts of the authors for their diligent work in compiling much of the existing literature on this topic. However, I disagree with the authors in their methods, interpretation of the results, and the appropriateness of using meta-analysis for this group of studies.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×