Correspondence: Dr Williams, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH England (firstname.lastname@example.org).
In response to the research letter by Majmundar and Hamilton,1 we would like to highlight some limitations of their article. We agree with the authors' ideals for implantable material for reconstruction of orbital fractures and that it should be easily shaped, but we would add that the material should also have the ability to retain its molded shape. SupraFOIL material (S. Jackson Inc, Alexandria, Virginia) will not retain its new shape, unlike some other materials, such as reinforced polyethylene (MEDPOR TITAN; Porex Surgical Products Inc, Newnan, Georgia) and titanium mesh. The cost argument is valid for all health equipment and interventions, but the material must be appropriate for the purpose for which it was intended.
Williams R, Parmar S. Orbital Floor Fracture Repair. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007;9(4):300-301. doi:10.1001/archfaci.9.4.300