[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.87.121.0. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Download PDF
Figure 1.
The hockey-stick method involves vertical dome division and modest excision of the lateral and medial crural elements to deproject the nasal tip. Notice that the vestibular skin underlying the excised portions has been maintained. The medial crura are then sutured together.

The hockey-stick method involves vertical dome division and modest excision of the lateral and medial crural elements to deproject the nasal tip. Notice that the vestibular skin underlying the excised portions has been maintained. The medial crura are then sutured together.

Figure 2.
A through C, 20-year-old woman with an overprojected nasal tip and dorsum. A through C, Preoperatively, the columella-to-lobule ratio is 3 to 1. D through F, Postoperative analysis 2 years later reveals a better equilateral shape to the base and an improved columella-to-lobule ratio of 2 to 1.

A through C, 20-year-old woman with an overprojected nasal tip and dorsum. A through C, Preoperatively, the columella-to-lobule ratio is 3 to 1. D through F, Postoperative analysis 2 years later reveals a better equilateral shape to the base and an improved columella-to-lobule ratio of 2 to 1.

Figure 3.
A 41-year-old man with a lifelong history of “warts” at the end of his nose. A through C, Preoperatively, the nasal tip is overprojected, with prominent divergence of the medial crura beneath thin skin. D through F, Postoperative views taken 1 year later show better tip contour and positioning.

A 41-year-old man with a lifelong history of “warts” at the end of his nose. A through C, Preoperatively, the nasal tip is overprojected, with prominent divergence of the medial crura beneath thin skin. D through F, Postoperative views taken 1 year later show better tip contour and positioning.

Figure 4.
A 38-year-old man with adequate tip projection but a wide nasal tip. A and B, Preoperatively, a wide nasal tip is seen. C and D, Postoperatively, nasal projection is maintained and the nasal tip is narrowed. The hockey-stick method uses vertical dome division (VDD) to “break the spring” of a broad and laterally prominent nasal tip.

A 38-year-old man with adequate tip projection but a wide nasal tip. A and B, Preoperatively, a wide nasal tip is seen. C and D, Postoperatively, nasal projection is maintained and the nasal tip is narrowed. The hockey-stick method uses vertical dome division (VDD) to “break the spring” of a broad and laterally prominent nasal tip.

Figure 5.
A 44-year-old woman with concerns about a long-appearing nose. A through C, Preoperative views reveal an overprojected nasal profile and a weak chin. D through F, Postoperative views taken 24 years later show better facial harmony achieved by using the hockey-stick approach combined with a mentoplasty. Her long-term follow-up demonstrates the lasting utility of this method.

A 44-year-old woman with concerns about a long-appearing nose. A through C, Preoperative views reveal an overprojected nasal profile and a weak chin. D through F, Postoperative views taken 24 years later show better facial harmony achieved by using the hockey-stick approach combined with a mentoplasty. Her long-term follow-up demonstrates the lasting utility of this method.

Table 1. 
Characteristics of 64 Patients Undergoing Hockey-Stick Vertical Dome Division and at Least 1 Year of Follow-up
Characteristics of 64 Patients Undergoing Hockey-Stick Vertical Dome Division and at Least 1 Year of Follow-up
Table 2. 
Characteristics of Patients With Bossae Formation
Characteristics of Patients With Bossae Formation
1.
Goode  RL A method of tip projection measurement. Powell  NHumphreys  BProportions of the Aesthetic Face. New York, NY Thieme-Stratton1984;15- 39
2.
Crumley  RLLanser  M Quantitative analysis of nasal tip projection. Laryngoscope 1988;98 (2) 202- 208
PubMedArticle
3.
Simons  RL Nasal tip projection, ptosis and supratip thickening. Ear Nose Throat J 1982;61452- 455
4.
Brown  JMcDowell  F Plastic Surgery of the Nose.  St Louis, MO CV Mosby Co1951;
5.
Smith  TW Reliable methods of tip reduction. Arch Otolaryngol 1978;104 (10) 564- 569
PubMedArticle
6.
Simons  RL Vertical dome division in rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1987;20 (4) 785- 796
PubMed
7.
Gillman  GSSimons  RLLee  DJ Nasal tip bossae in rhinoplasty: etiology, predisposing factors, and management techniques [published correction appears in Arch Facial Plast Surg. 1999;1(3):170]. Arch Facial Plast Surg 1999;1 (2) 83- 99
PubMedArticle
8.
Webster  RC Advances in surgery of the nasal tip: intact rim cartilage techniques and the tip-columella-lip esthetic complex. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1975;8 (3) 615- 644
PubMed
9.
Kridel  RWKonior  RJ Controlled nasal tip rotation via the lateral crural overlay technique. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;117 (4) 411- 415
PubMedArticle
10.
Lipsett  EM A new approach surgery of the lower cartilaginous vault. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 1959;70 (1) 42- 47
PubMedArticle
11.
McCurdy  JA Reduction of excessive nasal tip projection with a modified Lipsett technique. Ann Plast Surg 1978;1 (5) 478- 480
PubMedArticle
12.
Berman  WE Surgery of the nasal tip. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1975;8 (3) 563- 574
PubMed
13.
Guyuron  B Footplates of the medial crura. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101 (5) 1359- 1363
PubMedArticle
14.
Spina  VKamakura  LPsillakis  J A new method for correction of the prominent nasal tip. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973;51 (4) 416- 420
PubMedArticle
15.
Tobias  GW Modified universal tiplasty: closed structure rhinoplasty as it pertains to the overprojected and the broad tip. Facial Plast Surg 1994;10 (4) 389- 398
PubMedArticle
16.
Joseph  J Nasenplastik und Sonstige Geischtsplastik Nebst Mammaplastik.  Leipzig, Germany Curt Kabitzsch1931;
17.
Safian  J Corrective Rhinoplastic Surgery.  New York, NY P Hoeber1935;
18.
Close  LGSchaefer  SDSchultz  BA The over-projecting nasal tip: precise reduction without rotation. Laryngoscope 1987;97 (8, pt 1) 931- 936
PubMedArticle
19.
Foda  HM Alar setback technique: a controlled method of nasal tip deprojection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127 (11) 1341- 1346
PubMedArticle
20.
Soliemanzadeh  PKridel  RW Nasal tip overprojection: algorithm of surgical deprojection techniques and introduction of medial crural overlay. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005;7 (6) 374- 380
PubMedArticle
21.
Brennan  HG Dome-splitting technique in rhinoplasty with overlay of lateral crura. Arch Otolaryngol 1983;109 (9) 586- 592
PubMedArticle
Original Article
Mar/Apr 2008

Hockey-Stick Vertical Dome Division Technique for Overprojected and Broad Nasal Tips

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Departments of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Chang), and University of Miami, Miami, Florida (Dr Simons); and MIAMI Institute for Age Management and Intervention, Miami (Dr Simons).

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008;10(2):88-92. doi:10.1001/archfaci.10.2.88
Abstract

Objectives  To discuss overprojected and broad nasal tips, to overview treatment options, and to relate our experience with the hockey-stick technique.

Design  A retrospective review (1975-2005) was conducted. Patients were selected from a computerized rhinoplasty database of operative cases. The database was used to extract a subset population that had received the hockey-stick tip procedure and had follow-up data for 1 year or more after surgery. Medical records and photographs were also analyzed in this review of results and complications.

Results  The hockey-stick modification of vertical dome division was used in 137 patients (9.9% of the rhinoplasties in the computerized database). Of these, 64 patients had 1 year or more of follow-up. Complications referable to the nasal tip (eg, bossae, persistent tip projection, and alar asymmetry) were seen in 8 patients (13%). Revisions for tip-related problems were performed in 4 patients (6%).

Conclusions  The hockey-stick technique is an effective method for nasal tip deprojection and narrowing via an endonasal approach. The length of follow-up in this patient population allows good long-term evaluation of this technique.

The overprojected nasal tip is a facial characteristic in which a disharmony exists in the anterior projection of the nose from the facial plane. Fundamentally, the diagnosis of overprojection can be made using one of several methods when analyzing the lateral view. According to Goode,1 a line to the nasal tip drawn perpendicular to a line from the nasion through the alar-facial junction should be 55% to 60% of the dorsal nasal length from the nasion to the tip. Crumley and Lanser2 describe the ideal nose as one in which the length of a line from the nasion to the vermilion-cutaneous junction of the upper lip compares with the length of a perpendicular from this line to the tip-defining point with a ratio of 0.2833. In a simplification of these mathematical techniques, Simons3 relates the length of the upper lip (from the subnasale to the labrale superius) as ideally equivalent to the length from the subnasale to the tip.

In addition, the base view of the nose provides another valuable evaluation of nasal harmony. From this view, the nose should ideally have the shape of an equilateral triangle. An overprojected nose, however, will commonly take on the shape of an isosceles triangle from the base view. In addition, from this perspective, the ratio of the height of the columella to the lobule, which should be 2 to 1, can also be assessed. The overprojected nose will likely exhibit an elongated columella, although an overpronounced lobule segment may also be seen.

The etiology of nasal tip overprojection is multifactorial. A complex interplay exists among the shape of the lower lateral cartilages (LLCs), the quadrangular cartilage, and the nasal spine, all of which may be causative factors in a given patient. A large quadrangular cartilage, as manifested by a convex nasal dorsum or an elongated caudal septum, will project the anterior or posterior septal angle, respectively. The LLCs will, thus, be suspended farther away from the face. An elongated nasal spine provides a taller pedestal from which the medial crural feet are supported, again further projecting the tip. Oversized LLCs with long crura can thrust the tip forward and may even tent the overlying skin to such an extreme that the underlying cartilages themselves can be seen in bas-relief.

The wide, broad tip is a result of poor tip definition, but it may similarly be a result of excessive LLC length in the domes.Consider the scenario in which an adequately projected nasal tip is wide, with flattened domal regions on the anterior view. In such a case, the portion of the LLC that constitutes the dome is excessive in length. Creating a defined dome high point will redistribute the excessive domal cartilage to either the medial crus, the lateral crus, or both. As a result, the medial and lateral crura are effectively lengthened, accentuating tip projection if no other compensatory maneuvers are performed. A deprojection technique is, therefore, necessary to reestablish harmony.

To effectively deproject the nose, length reduction of overdeveloped anatomical components is required. Although major and minor tip supports can be disrupted using various maneuvers (eg, complete transfixion incision, lowering of the septal angle, reduction of the nasal spine), often some modification of the LLC is necessary. The hockey-stick approach to cartilage reduction has been a successful tool for correcting the overprojected nasal tip. Described by Brown and McDowell4 and later reintroduced by Smith,5 this technique involves vertical dome division and removal of excessive cartilage containing the dome and adjacent medial and lateral crural components to effect a change. We review our experience with this method.

METHODS

A retrospective review (1975-2005) was conducted. Patients were selected via a search of a computerized rhinoplasty database of operative cases performed by the senior author (R.L.S.). The database contains information regarding patient demographics, preoperative analysis, operative techniques, postoperative results, and complications. The medical records of all the patients had been entered into the database without previous consideration given to this study. The database was used to extract a subset population that had received the hockey-stick tip procedure and had follow-up data for 1 year or more after surgery. Medical records and photographs were also analyzed in this review of results and complications.

All the procedures were performed using an endonasal rhinoplasty technique. After the appropriate dorsal profile had been achieved, the LLCs were delivered using a marginal incision combined with an intercartilaginous incision. The natural domal high point was determined by inserting a right angle hook behind the soft-tissue facet, impaling the anatomical apex of the LLC. The cartilage was delivered, cleaned of its overlying soft tissue, and then vertically divided on either side of the apex to resect a variable portion of the medial and lateral crura, generally no more than 2 mm on either side of the apex (Figure 1). Vestibular skin and mucosa were preserved. A 5-0 clear nylon suture was used to bring together the medial crural ends. The suture was placed in a specific manner as previously described.6 Although in early cases this suture was not always used, it has become standard in the current technique to narrow the tip and prevent the occurrence of bossae.

RESULTS

The hockey-stick modification of vertical dome division was used in 137 patients (approximately 10% of all the rhinoplasties in the computerized database); 64 of these patients had 1 year or more of follow-up (Table 1).

Complications referable to the nasal tip were seen in 8 patients (13%). Bossae were noted in 4 patients (6%) (Table 2). We previously observed that predisposing factors to bossae formation include thin skin and widened interdomal distance (tip bifidity).7 Of these 4 patients, 2 had both contributing factors of thin skin and bifidity. However, in 1 patient, the tip-defining portions of the medial crura were not sutured together. The remaining 2 patients had normal skin, although 1 patient exhibited bifidity preoperatively. The domes were not initially sutured together in this patient. Two patients did not subjectively achieve adequate deprojection of the nasal tip. Alar asymmetries were noted in 2 other patients.

Revisions for tip-related problems were performed in 4 patients (6%). Reasons included the need for further deprojection (2 patients) and the correction of bossae (2 patients). Complications for other parts of the rhinoplasty (dorsal alignment, dorsal symmetry, nasal bone configuration, and others) were not addressed in this study.

COMMENT

The overdeveloped LLCs can be surgically altered in the overprojected nose to improve nasal balance and to deproject the nose. The various surgical maneuvers to modify the LLCs can be categorized into techniques that alter the lateral or medial crura or that involve dome division or truncation.

Shortening of the lateral crus can deproject the nose and induce tip rotation. Webster8 advocated a lateral crural flap technique to effect controlled retrodisplacement of the tip. Instead of completely removing the cephalic aspect of the lateral crus, delineated by a rim strip incision, Webster preserved a portion of the cartilage as a lateral crural flap to provide better stability to the rim strip. Retrodisplacement could be effected by telescoping the rim strip with the flap or by excising a small portion of the flap to create a void, into which the LLC would telescope. Kridel and Konior9 would later describe a lateral crural overlay technique that involved vertically cutting the lateral crus at its middle aspect, then overlapping and suturing the cut ends to shorten the total length of the lateral crus.

Medial crura shortening techniques have also been advocated for deprojection. Lipsett10 advocated splitting the LLC medial to the dome, resecting a length of the cartilage just lateral to the incision, and reshaping the lateral crus remnant using multiple scoring incisions on the cartilage to recreate a new dome. This was performed using a rim incision and a cartilage delivery technique. Modifications of the Lipsett technique by other authors include preserving the underlying vestibular skin, delivering the cartilage with a marginal incision, and morselizing the cartilage.11,12 Guyuron13 and Spina et al14 suggested the excision of medial crura foot pods to deproject the nasal tip. Tobias15 advocated removal of a section of the medial crura while reshaping and binding the lateral crura to secure a stable “A-frame” complex.

To create deprojection of the nasal tip without altering tip rotation, the lateral and medial crura need to be equally shortened. Joseph16 and Safian17 described achieving deprojection by excising lateral and medial crura elements. This would be later modified to accommodate an external rhinoplasty technique. Close et al18 removed a calculated length of the medial and lateral crura. The remnants would be sutured together end to end. Later, Foda19 and Soliemanzadeh and Kridel20 combined medial and lateral crura overlay and suturing techniques to effect deprojection.

Vertical dome division continues to be a versatile means of effecting change to the nasal tip. The hockey-stick approach is one technique along the spectrum of vertical division techniques, which include the Goldman procedure and the Simons modification. Herein we demonstrate the hockey-stick modification as a useful technique for 2 main objectives: (1) nasal tip deprojection (Figure 2 and Figure 3) and (2) narrowing the nasal tip in the broad but adequately projected nose (Figure 4). Deprojection is achieved by excising the excessive cartilage comprising the dome and adjacent medial and lateral crural components. By modeling the nasal tip as a tripod, shortening each of the legs (2 legs formed by each lateral crus and the third leg by the combined medial crura) drops the nasal tip closer to the face. The vestibular mucosa beneath the excised dome serves as a scaffold to draw the medial ends of the lateral crus toward the new dome, preventing notching along the caudal aspect of the nostril rim. Tip narrowing is effected by sewing the ends of the medial crura together using a permanent suture. Subtle changes in tip rotation can be effected by selectively resecting more lateral than medial crus to cause increased rotation and vice versa for tip derotation.

Regarding the broad but adequately projected tip, simple incisional or suture shaping techniques are inappropriate. In the broad-tipped nose, the portion of the LLC that comprises the domal region is too generous.Creating a defined dome high point will redistribute the excessive domal cartilage to the medial crura, the lateral crura, or both. As a result, the medial and lateral crura are effectively lengthened, accentuating tip projection. However, by using the hockey-stick technique, this excessive region is excised, allowing just the adequate length of the medial and lateral crura to reappose to form the tip.

Bossae formation was the most frequent complication in this series. To avoid this, we now advocate suturing together the medial crura in almost all patients. In addition to narrowing the tip, this suture also prevents the medial crural ends from splaying apart, a potential cause of bossae. When excising the dome, one must take care to include enough of the lateral crura so as not to allow the lateral crural ends to override the medial crural ends. Although the overlap of lateral crura over medial crura was advocated by Brennan,21 we believe that such a technique may also lead to bossae formation. The use of crushed cartilage placed in the infratip lobule region has been a mainstay when performing a vertical dome division maneuver such as the hockey-stick approach. The cartilage provides a cushion between the overlying thin skin and the tip-defining points of the LLC, minimizing the potential for irregularities or possible bossae formation.

We usually combine the hockey-stick technique with other adjunctive maneuvers to effect final tip deprojection. We begin the endonasal rhinoplasty with a complete and full transfixion incision. This provides access to the nasal spine, which may need to be reduced. The incision also disrupts the membranous septum, a minor tip-supporting mechanism. Other overprojected anatomical structures are addressed appropriately, including the anterior septal angle and the caudal septum. Finally, the LLC is delivered and truncated via the hockey-stick technique to provide the necessary reduction of excessive LLC length and create deprojection. A weak chin can also accentuate an overprojected nasal profile. The addition of a mental implant helps to offset this disharmony, balancing out nasal projection with adequate chin projection (Figure 5).

In conclusion, overprojected and broad nasal tips require deprojecting maneuvers to reestablish proportional harmony to the nose. The hockey-stick vertical dome division technique is suited to reducing the excessively long components of the LLC while reshaping the tip appropriately. The length of follow-up in this patient population allows good long-term evaluation of this technique.

Back to top
Article Information

Correspondence: C. W. David Chang, MD, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Missouri, One Hospital Drive, MA 314, Columbia, MO 65212 (changda@health.missouri.edu).

Accepted for Publication: October 8, 2007.

Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Chang and Simons. Acquisition of data: Chang and Simons. Analysis and interpretation of data: Chang and Simons. Drafting of the manuscript: Chang and Simons. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Chang and Simons. Administrative, technical, and material support: Chang and Simons. Study supervision: Simons.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Previous Presentation: This study is presented as a poster at the Ninth International Symposium of Facial Plastic Surgery; May 1-4, 2006; Las Vegas, Nevada.

References
1.
Goode  RL A method of tip projection measurement. Powell  NHumphreys  BProportions of the Aesthetic Face. New York, NY Thieme-Stratton1984;15- 39
2.
Crumley  RLLanser  M Quantitative analysis of nasal tip projection. Laryngoscope 1988;98 (2) 202- 208
PubMedArticle
3.
Simons  RL Nasal tip projection, ptosis and supratip thickening. Ear Nose Throat J 1982;61452- 455
4.
Brown  JMcDowell  F Plastic Surgery of the Nose.  St Louis, MO CV Mosby Co1951;
5.
Smith  TW Reliable methods of tip reduction. Arch Otolaryngol 1978;104 (10) 564- 569
PubMedArticle
6.
Simons  RL Vertical dome division in rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1987;20 (4) 785- 796
PubMed
7.
Gillman  GSSimons  RLLee  DJ Nasal tip bossae in rhinoplasty: etiology, predisposing factors, and management techniques [published correction appears in Arch Facial Plast Surg. 1999;1(3):170]. Arch Facial Plast Surg 1999;1 (2) 83- 99
PubMedArticle
8.
Webster  RC Advances in surgery of the nasal tip: intact rim cartilage techniques and the tip-columella-lip esthetic complex. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1975;8 (3) 615- 644
PubMed
9.
Kridel  RWKonior  RJ Controlled nasal tip rotation via the lateral crural overlay technique. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;117 (4) 411- 415
PubMedArticle
10.
Lipsett  EM A new approach surgery of the lower cartilaginous vault. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 1959;70 (1) 42- 47
PubMedArticle
11.
McCurdy  JA Reduction of excessive nasal tip projection with a modified Lipsett technique. Ann Plast Surg 1978;1 (5) 478- 480
PubMedArticle
12.
Berman  WE Surgery of the nasal tip. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1975;8 (3) 563- 574
PubMed
13.
Guyuron  B Footplates of the medial crura. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101 (5) 1359- 1363
PubMedArticle
14.
Spina  VKamakura  LPsillakis  J A new method for correction of the prominent nasal tip. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973;51 (4) 416- 420
PubMedArticle
15.
Tobias  GW Modified universal tiplasty: closed structure rhinoplasty as it pertains to the overprojected and the broad tip. Facial Plast Surg 1994;10 (4) 389- 398
PubMedArticle
16.
Joseph  J Nasenplastik und Sonstige Geischtsplastik Nebst Mammaplastik.  Leipzig, Germany Curt Kabitzsch1931;
17.
Safian  J Corrective Rhinoplastic Surgery.  New York, NY P Hoeber1935;
18.
Close  LGSchaefer  SDSchultz  BA The over-projecting nasal tip: precise reduction without rotation. Laryngoscope 1987;97 (8, pt 1) 931- 936
PubMedArticle
19.
Foda  HM Alar setback technique: a controlled method of nasal tip deprojection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127 (11) 1341- 1346
PubMedArticle
20.
Soliemanzadeh  PKridel  RW Nasal tip overprojection: algorithm of surgical deprojection techniques and introduction of medial crural overlay. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005;7 (6) 374- 380
PubMedArticle
21.
Brennan  HG Dome-splitting technique in rhinoplasty with overlay of lateral crura. Arch Otolaryngol 1983;109 (9) 586- 592
PubMedArticle
×