[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.167.137. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Download PDF
Figure 1.
Classic Caucasian vertical fifths of the face (adapted from Powell and Humphries7).

Classic Caucasian vertical fifths of the face (adapted from Powell and Humphries7).

Figure 2.
Classic Caucasian alar base anatomy (adapted from Powell and Humphries7).

Classic Caucasian alar base anatomy (adapted from Powell and Humphries7).

Figure 3.
Wedge excision.

Wedge excision.

Figure 4.
Wedge and sill excisions.

Wedge and sill excisions.

Figure 5.
V-Y Advancement. A, The hook is placed in the lateral aspect of the wedge incision in the area of the nasolabial fold. B, After suturing, this creates the stem of the “Y,” which is aligned with the nasolabial fold.

V-Y Advancement. A, The hook is placed in the lateral aspect of the wedge incision in the area of the nasolabial fold. B, After suturing, this creates the stem of the “Y,” which is aligned with the nasolabial fold.

Figure 6.
Ethnic variations in the nostril axis (adapted from Farkas et al18).

Ethnic variations in the nostril axis (adapted from Farkas et al18).

Figure 7.
Variations in nostril axis on an ethnic face based on observations by Porter8 and Sim et al.20 Note that the interalar vs intercanthal distance is roughly 1:1.25 for women or 1:1.3 for men.

Variations in nostril axis on an ethnic face based on observations by Porter8 and Sim et al.20 Note that the interalar vs intercanthal distance is roughly 1:1.25 for women or 1:1.3 for men.

Figure 8.
Variability of the nasal base (adapted from Bernstein15).

Variability of the nasal base (adapted from Bernstein15).

Figure 9.
Axis of alar insertion. A, Divergent; B, normal; C, convergent (adapted from Brissett and Sherris22).

Axis of alar insertion. A, Divergent; B, normal; C, convergent (adapted from Brissett and Sherris22).

Figure 10.
The deprojected nose is predisposed to alar flaring. Conversely, increased tip projection decreases alar flare. Adapted from Adamson et al.1

The deprojected nose is predisposed to alar flaring. Conversely, increased tip projection decreases alar flare. Adapted from Adamson et al.1

Figure 11.
A, The preoperative nostril axis is vertically oriented; B, the postoperative axis is more oblique. Deprojection of the nose widens the nasal base and alters nostril shape. The vertical alar redundancy (A) has been repositioned (B), resulting in an almond-shaped nostril with a shift in axis. No wedge or sill excision was performed.

A, The preoperative nostril axis is vertically oriented; B, the postoperative axis is more oblique. Deprojection of the nose widens the nasal base and alters nostril shape. The vertical alar redundancy (A) has been repositioned (B), resulting in an almond-shaped nostril with a shift in axis. No wedge or sill excision was performed.

Figure 12.
Deprojection and wedge excision. A, Preoperative view. B, Two-year postoperative view: the nostril has not been violated, and there is no excess nasal flare. C, Seven-year postoperative view shows a consistent result.

Deprojection and wedge excision. A, Preoperative view. B, Two-year postoperative view: the nostril has not been violated, and there is no excess nasal flare. C, Seven-year postoperative view shows a consistent result.

Figure 13.
A “tear-drop” or “Q” deformity (A; arrow) may result from excisions of the lateral alar wall (B; adapted from Szachowicz and Kridel6). One must “preserve the curve” of the alar rim when performing wedge excisions. In this patient, too much alar flare has been removed, resulting in a straightened lateral ala, and the base reduction incision has violated the internal alar rim.

A “tear-drop” or “Q” deformity (A; arrow) may result from excisions of the lateral alar wall (B; adapted from Szachowicz and Kridel6). One must “preserve the curve” of the alar rim when performing wedge excisions. In this patient, too much alar flare has been removed, resulting in a straightened lateral ala, and the base reduction incision has violated the internal alar rim.

Figure 14.
Algorithm to determine performing wedge excision alone, wedge excision plus sill excision, or wedge excision plus sill excision plus V-Y advancement

Algorithm to determine performing wedge excision alone, wedge excision plus sill excision, or wedge excision plus sill excision plus V-Y advancement

Figure 15.
Alar wedge excision. Deep 5-0 Vicryl [polyglactin 910] suture placement decreases skin edge tension. Closure is accomplished with simple interrupted 6-0 Prolene sutures.

Alar wedge excision. Deep 5-0 Vicryl [polyglactin 910] suture placement decreases skin edge tension. Closure is accomplished with simple interrupted 6-0 Prolene sutures.

Figure 16.
Alar wedge resection. A, Wedge excision completed on the left and planned on right. Note the alar flare, the incision in the alar-facial groove, and the preservation of the nostril sill. B, Wedge excision. C, Placement of deep stitch. D, Simple interrupted closure. E, Reduced flare (base view). F and H, Preoperative photos showing alar flare. G and I, Incisions are well healed at 1-month follow-up. Note that some of the curvature of the lateral ala is preserved to maintain a natural appearance. Too great a removal causes lateral alar straightening. At no point does this incision enter the nostril opening.

Alar wedge resection. A, Wedge excision completed on the left and planned on right. Note the alar flare, the incision in the alar-facial groove, and the preservation of the nostril sill. B, Wedge excision. C, Placement of deep stitch. D, Simple interrupted closure. E, Reduced flare (base view). F and H, Preoperative photos showing alar flare. G and I, Incisions are well healed at 1-month follow-up. Note that some of the curvature of the lateral ala is preserved to maintain a natural appearance. Too great a removal causes lateral alar straightening. At no point does this incision enter the nostril opening.

Figure 17.
A and C, Preoperative views of alar flaring; B and D, minimal evidence of incisions (wedge incisions only) at 10-day follow-up.

A and C, Preoperative views of alar flaring; B and D, minimal evidence of incisions (wedge incisions only) at 10-day follow-up.

Figure 18.
Intraoperative views of alar wedge and sill excisions. A, Both alar flaring and sill excess are present. B, Open rhinoplasty is performed with increased tip projection and a modest change in the nostril shape. C, Incisions are placed to remove flare and to enter the nasal sill medially to the alar insertions, preserving the lateral ala. On the patient’s left (C), flare and sill excisions have been carried out, and markings show the planned excision on the patient’s right. The oblique marking line (C) is useful for realigning the alar segment after the sill excess has been removed. D, Flare and sill reduction are completed bilaterally.

Intraoperative views of alar wedge and sill excisions. A, Both alar flaring and sill excess are present. B, Open rhinoplasty is performed with increased tip projection and a modest change in the nostril shape. C, Incisions are placed to remove flare and to enter the nasal sill medially to the alar insertions, preserving the lateral ala. On the patient’s left (C), flare and sill excisions have been carried out, and markings show the planned excision on the patient’s right. The oblique marking line (C) is useful for realigning the alar segment after the sill excess has been removed. D, Flare and sill reduction are completed bilaterally.

Figure 19.
The V-Y advancement can narrow the alar base insertion while placing incisions within the nasolabial fold.

The V-Y advancement can narrow the alar base insertion while placing incisions within the nasolabial fold.

Figure 20.
The V-Y advancement after wedge and sill excisions. A, After the nostril rim is reapproximated, a single-prong skin hook is used to draw skin excess into the nasolabial fold. B, Usually three to four 6-0 Prolene sutures are used to create the stem of the “Y.” This will medialize the alar rim. C, At least 2 mm of medialization is achieved on the right side with V-Y advancement. Sill and flare excision and ala medialization with the V-Y advancement have been accomplished on the patient’s left side. Incisions are planned on the patient’s right side. Note the reduced sill width on the left side. D, Postoperative V-Y medialization of the alar insertion. E, The number of sutures in the stem of the “Y” will determine the degree of medialization.

The V-Y advancement after wedge and sill excisions. A, After the nostril rim is reapproximated, a single-prong skin hook is used to draw skin excess into the nasolabial fold. B, Usually three to four 6-0 Prolene sutures are used to create the stem of the “Y.” This will medialize the alar rim. C, At least 2 mm of medialization is achieved on the right side with V-Y advancement. Sill and flare excision and ala medialization with the V-Y advancement have been accomplished on the patient’s left side. Incisions are planned on the patient’s right side. Note the reduced sill width on the left side. D, Postoperative V-Y medialization of the alar insertion. E, The number of sutures in the stem of the “Y” will determine the degree of medialization.

Figure 21.
Wedge excision, sill excision, and V-Y advancement. A and C, Preoperative views; B and D, 6 months after the procedure. Increased projection has also been achieved with a columellar strut, a medial crural base plumping graft, and a tip graft. Notice the change in nostril axis (A and B) with increased tip projection and narrowing of the interalar distance. The horizontal nostril axis is a general indication for nasal sill excision. No dermabrasion of incisions was performed postoperatively as the stem of the “Y” is well hidden in the nasolabial fold.

Wedge excision, sill excision, and V-Y advancement. A and C, Preoperative views; B and D, 6 months after the procedure. Increased projection has also been achieved with a columellar strut, a medial crural base plumping graft, and a tip graft. Notice the change in nostril axis (A and B) with increased tip projection and narrowing of the interalar distance. The horizontal nostril axis is a general indication for nasal sill excision. No dermabrasion of incisions was performed postoperatively as the stem of the “Y” is well hidden in the nasolabial fold.

Figure 22.
This patient underwent increased tip projection, alar wedge excision, sill excision, and V-Y advancement. A and E, Preoperative views reveal increased alar flare, sill, and interalar distance. B and F, Seven months after the procedure. The interalar distance has decreased postoperatively. C and D, No dermabrasion was performed because the stem of the “Y” is almost imperceptible in the nasolabial fold.

This patient underwent increased tip projection, alar wedge excision, sill excision, and V-Y advancement. A and E, Preoperative views reveal increased alar flare, sill, and interalar distance. B and F, Seven months after the procedure. The interalar distance has decreased postoperatively. C and D, No dermabrasion was performed because the stem of the “Y” is almost imperceptible in the nasolabial fold.

Figure 23.
This patient underwent increased tip projection, wedge excision, and V-Y advancement with postoperative dermabrasion for scarring. A and E, Preoperative views reveal increased alar flare, sill, and interalar distance. B and F, Postoperative views. C and D, Incisions are imperceptible after dermabrasion.

This patient underwent increased tip projection, wedge excision, and V-Y advancement with postoperative dermabrasion for scarring. A and E, Preoperative views reveal increased alar flare, sill, and interalar distance. B and F, Postoperative views. C and D, Incisions are imperceptible after dermabrasion.

Table 1. 
Characteristics of 124 Patients Undergoing Alar Base Reduction*
Characteristics of 124 Patients Undergoing Alar Base Reduction*
Table 2. 
Procedures of 31 Patients Requiring Dermabrasion*
Procedures of 31 Patients Requiring Dermabrasion*
1.
Adamson  PASmith  OTropper  GJMcGraw  B Analysis of alar base narrowing. Am J Cosmet Surg 1990;7239- 243
2.
Daniel  RKRhinoplasty. New York, NY Little Brown1993;307- 312
3.
Becker  DGWeinberger  MSGreene  BATardy  ME Clinical study of alar anatomy and surgery of the alar base. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123789- 795
PubMedArticle
4.
McCollough  EGAltering the Alar Base: Nasal Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia, Pa WB Saunders Co1994;247- 255
5.
Rohrich  RJMuzaffar  AR Rhinoplasty in the African-American patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;1111322- 1339
PubMedArticle
6.
Szachowicz  EKridel  RW Adjunctive measures to rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1987;20895- 912
PubMed
7.
Powell  NPHumphries  BProportions of the Aesthetic Face. New York, NY Thieme-Stratton Inc1984;8
8.
Porter  JP The average African American male face. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;678- 81
PubMedArticle
9.
Tardy  MEPatt  BSWalter  MA Alar reduction and sculpture: anatomic concepts. Facial Plast Surg 1993;9295- 305
PubMedArticle
10.
Tebbets  JBPrimary Rhinoplasty: A New Approach to the Logic and the Techniques. St Louis, Mo CV Mosby Co1998;481- 492
11.
Sheen  JHAesthetic Rhinoplasty. St Louis, Mo CV Mosby Co1978;
12.
Weir  RF On restoring sunken noses without scarring the face. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1988;12203- 206
PubMedArticle
13.
Joseph  JNasenplastik und sonstige Gesichtsplastik nebst enim Anhang Über Mamaplastik. Leipzig, Germany Curt Kabitzsh1931;110- 113
14.
Aufricht  G A few hints and surgical details in rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 1943;57317- 335
15.
Bernstein  L Esthetic anatomy of the nose. Laryngoscope 1972;821323- 1330
PubMedArticle
16.
Crumley  RL Aesthetics and surgery of the nasal base. Facial Plast Surg 1988;5135- 142
PubMedArticle
17.
Anderson  JR A reasoned approach to nasal base surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 1984;110349- 358
PubMedArticle
18.
Farkas  LGHreczko  TADeutsch  CK Objective assessment of standard nostril types: a morphometric study. Ann Plast Surg 1983;11381- 389
PubMedArticle
19.
Porter  JPOlson  KL Analysis of the African American female nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111620- 626
PubMedArticle
20.
Sim  RSSmith  JDChan  AS Comparison of the aesthetic facial proportions of southern Chinese and white women. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2000;2113- 120
PubMedArticle
21.
Choe  KSSclafani  APLitner  JAYu  GRomo  T The Korean American woman’s face. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6244- 252
PubMedArticle
22.
Brissett  AESherris  DA Changing the nostril shape. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2000;8433- 445
23.
Liu  ESKridel  RWH Evaluation of nasoalveolar cysts for the facial plastic surgeon. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003;5185- 188
PubMedArticle
24.
Peck  GCGruber  RMichelson  LN Alar wedge excisions. Peck  GCGruber  RRhinoplasty: State of the Art. St Louis, Mo Mosby1993;139- 150
25.
Millard  DR The alar cinch in the flat, flaring nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980;65669- 672
PubMedArticle
26.
Cinelli  JA Calibrated Weir operation. Arch Otolaryngol 1961;74189- 191
PubMedArticle
27.
Rees  TD Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.  Philadelphia, Pa WB Saunders Co1980;243- 273
28.
Gilbert  SE Alar reductions in rhinoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;122781- 784
PubMedArticle
29.
Bernstein  L Rhinoplasty for the negroid nose. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1975;8783- 795
PubMed
30.
Mazzola  RF Secondary unilateral cleft lip nose: the external approach. Facial Plast Surg 1996;12367- 378
PubMedArticle
31.
Bafaqeeh  SAAl-Quattan  MM Simultaneous open rhinoplasty and alar base excision: is there a problem with the blood supply of the nasal tip and columellar skin? Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105344- 347
PubMedArticle
32.
Grymer  LF Reduction rhinoplasty and nasal patency: change in cross-sectional area of the nose evaluated by acoustic rhinometry. Laryngoscope 1995;105429- 431
PubMedArticle
33.
Khosh  MMJen  AHonrado  CPearlman  SJ Nasal valve reconstruction. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6167- 181
PubMedArticle
Original Article
March 2005

A Simplified Approach to Alar Base ReductionA Review of 124 Patients Over 20 Years

Author Affiliations
 

Author Affiliations: Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston (Dr Kridel); and Department of Otolaryngology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Dr Castellano).

Correspondence: Russell W. H. Kridel, MD, 6655 Travis St, Suite 900, Houston, TX 77030 (rkridel@todaysface.com).

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005;7(2):81-93. doi:10.1001/archfaci.7.2.81
Abstract

Objectives  To simplify the approach and diagnosis of alar base reduction, suggest a treatment algorithm, and evaluate the long-term outcomes of 3 different techniques used separately or in conjunction with one another.

Design  Retrospective review of 124 patients seen in a private practice by a single surgeon. Patients ranged in age from 15 to 59 years (mean age, 30.4 years). Patients were undergoing primary (83.9%) or revision (16.1%) procedures.

Results  Of the 124 patients undergoing alar base reduction, 31 (25%) were male and 93 (75%) were female. Average follow-up was 2 years. All patients underwent wedge excision, and for 64 patients (51.6%), this was the only technique used on the alar base. Alar wedge and nasal sill excisions were performed in 21 patients (16.9%); 19 (15.3%) underwent alar wedge excision with V-Y advancement, and 20 (16.1%) underwent alar wedge excision, nasal sill excision, and V-Y advancement. Thirty-one patients (25.0%) received dermabrasion for notable postoperative incision scars.

Conclusions  The data represent the senior author’s outcomes of alar base reductions over the past 20 years. The 3 techniques we describe have been effective when used alone or in combination in reducing alar flare and in narrowing the nasal base. Patients should be counseled that dermabrasion of the wedge excision areas in the alar-facial groove may be necessary to diminish visible scars.

Alar base reduction is an intriguing and often inadequately described technique of rhinoplasty. Numerous approaches to narrow the nasal base have been discussed. It is generally agreed that reduction of nasal base width should be considered when the interalar distance exceeds the intercanthal distance in the Caucasian patient1-6 (Figure 1). However, ethnic differences and personal preference may necessitate significant variation from this standard.8 Another common indication for reducing the alar width is to correct the sidewall flaring that retrodisplacement of the nasal tip may cause.9-10 Alar flaring is defined as the lateral aspect of the ala extending significantly beyond the alar-facial groove (Figure 2).2-3,6, 11

Figure 1.
Classic Caucasian vertical fifths of the face (adapted from Powell and Humphries7).
Classic Caucasian vertical fifths of the face (adapted from Powell and Humphries7).

Figure 2.
Classic Caucasian alar base anatomy (adapted from Powell and Humphries7).
Classic Caucasian alar base anatomy (adapted from Powell and Humphries7).

Once the need for alar base reduction has been ascertained, we use a combination of 3 basic techniques to effect this change. Classically described by Weir,12 with subsequent modification by Joseph13 and Aufricht,14 the modified Weir incision (or alar wedge excision) (Figure 3) is our technique of choice for excessive flaring of the ala for the frontal appearance of a wide nasal base. Our wedge excision technique spares entering into the nostril and violating the naturally curved internal nostril border. The goals of the wedge excision are to avoid overstraightening the ala, to preserve the natural curvature of the ala, and to avoid telltale incisions into the nostril opening. This maneuver may be used in concert with nasal sill excision, initially described by Aufricht,14 for correction of the excessive flare with enlarged nasal sill width (Figure 4). A relative indication for sill reduction is when the nostril is enlarged and has a horizontal axis. When the alar base is wide because of a large nasal sill and no flaring is present, the sill alone is directly narrowed, though this is very rare. If the lateral insertion of the ala is responsible for excessive nasal base width, then we reposition the alar insertion with a V-Y advancement, as defined by Bernstein (Figure 5).15

Figure 3.
Wedge excision.
Wedge excision.

Figure 4.
Wedge and sill excisions.
Wedge and sill excisions.

Figure 5.
V-Y Advancement. A, The hook is placed in the lateral aspect of the wedge incision in the area of the nasolabial fold. B, After suturing, this creates the stem of the “Y,” which is aligned with the nasolabial fold.
V-Y Advancement. A, The hook is placed in the lateral aspect of the wedge incision in the area of the nasolabial fold. B, After suturing, this creates the stem of the “Y,” which is aligned with the nasolabial fold.

The purpose of this article is to further explore the techniques available for alar base reduction by discussing the experiences of the senior author (R.W.H.K.), examining outcomes in 124 patients, and comparing this with what is presented in the current rhinoplasty literature. While this procedure is not appropriate for most rhinoplasties, it is still an essential tool for the rhinoplastic surgeon and deserves a thorough analysis. Overall, we intend to provide a review of this topic, simplify the analysis and approach, and aid the surgeon in achieving the most natural result attainable.

METHODS

Patients were selected from a review of medical charts from the senior author’s (R.W.H.K.) practice spanning almost 20 years of experience (May 3, 1983 to April 17, 2003). Inclusion criteria were history of wedge resection, nasal sill excision, and/or V-Y advancement during rhinoplasty. The exclusion criterion was patients who did not follow-up at the practice. Data were collected on length of follow-up, procedures performed, age, ethnicity, and sex. Procedures were also classified as primary or revision septorhinoplasty. Filemaker Pro (Macintosh, Cupertino, Calif) and Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, Wash) were used for database management.

NASAL ANATOMY

Preoperative evaluation of the base of the nose should include the size, shape, symmetry of the nostrils, the width and length of the columella, the relationship between the columellar length and height of the lobule, and the thickness and contour of the alae. The classic Caucasian nasal base width should approximate the intercanthal distance (Figure 1). The Caucasian nasal base resembles an equilateral triangle, with the length of the columella being twice the height of the lobule and equal in length to the height of the upper lip (Figure 2). The nostrils should be pear-shaped, about the same width as the columella, and have their long axis oriented at approximately a 45° angle to the vertical axis of the columella.6, 16-17 Farkas et al18 demonstrated the degree of variation that can be seen in the axis of the nostril in African American, Asian, or Mestizo subjects (Figure 6).

Figure 6.
Ethnic variations in the nostril axis (adapted from Farkas et al18).
Ethnic variations in the nostril axis (adapted from Farkas et al18).

The base of the classic Caucasian nose is most aesthetically pleasing when it is slightly taller than wide and has minimal alar flare. Porter8 together with Olson19 discuss at length the anthropomorphic features of African American women and men, noting that in men, the interalar ratio compared with the intercanthal distance is approximately 1.3:1, whereas the female ratio is 1.25:1 (Figure 7). Sim et al20 reviewed the facial features of 100 southern Chinese women and compared them with white North American women. They found that it was more common for the southern Chinese face to have a nasal width greater than the intercanthal distance. In addition, the alae were more flared, and the nostrils were more horizontally oriented. Choe et al21 describe that it is more common for the nasal base width in Korean Americans to actually be more narrow than the intercanthal distance. Bernstein15 elaborates further on the wide variability of the nasal base that may be encountered (Figure 8).

Figure 7.
Variations in nostril axis on an ethnic face based on observations by Porter8 and Sim et al.20 Note that the interalar vs intercanthal distance is roughly 1:1.25 for women or 1:1.3 for men.
Variations in nostril axis on an ethnic face based on observations by Porter8 and Sim et al.20 Note that the interalar vs intercanthal distance is roughly 1:1.25 for women or 1:1.3 for men.

Figure 8.
Variability of the nasal base (adapted from Bernstein15).
Variability of the nasal base (adapted from Bernstein15).

An additional anatomic consideration for alar base reduction is that of the alar axis. Sheen11 defined the alar axes to be divergent, straight, or convergent (Figure 9). Brissett and Sherris22 noted that the convergent alar axis is not amenable to alar base reduction and should be avoided.

Figure 9.
Axis of alar insertion. A, Divergent; B, normal; C, convergent (adapted from Brissett and Sherris22).
Axis of alar insertion. A, Divergent; B, normal; C, convergent (adapted from Brissett and Sherris22).

Flaring, or the lateral aspect of the ala extending significantly beyond the alar-facial groove, may result for a variety of reasons. Ethnicity, trauma, cocaine use, or previous rhinoplasty (ie, reduction rhinoplasty with retrodisplacement of the tip or derotation) (Figure 10) may yield a widened nasal base. Flaring may also take on the appearance of the lateral ala, assuming a more circular shape than that of a gentle curve. Nostril asymmetry, often unnoticed by the patient, may be caused by a wide columella, caudal septal deviation, prominent medial crural feet, congenital defects, or nasal masses.23 The nasal sill is the posterior portion of the nostril between the ala and the columella. The nasal sill is often greater than or equal to the columellar width. Internal to the nasal sill is the nasal floor, which is continuous with the nasal vestibule (Figure 2).

Figure 10.
The deprojected nose is predisposed to alar flaring. Conversely, increased tip projection decreases alar flare. Adapted from Adamson et al.1
The deprojected nose is predisposed to alar flaring. Conversely, increased tip projection decreases alar flare. Adapted from Adamson et al.1

TECHNIQUE

Modification of the nasal base is not a routine part of rhinoplasty and should be implemented in a conservative manner as overresection is extremely difficult to correct. When in doubt, we do not perform the excision at the time of the initial rhinoplasty. Rather, in such cases it is best to wait until the nose heals and if the patient desires, the procedure is performed in the office several weeks or months afterward. This should always be the last maneuver in rhinoplasty as deprojection may increase the appearance of flare (Figure 11 and Figure 12). Conversely, projection of the nose may reduce the need to perform alar base reduction. Of note, deprojection will not change the nostril sill size, except when there is a significant tension septum. The “tent pole” effect of the septum on the nasal skin can stretch the nostrils to a larger size; hence, release of this tension may diminish nostril size.

Figure 11.
A, The preoperative nostril axis is vertically oriented; B, the postoperative axis is more oblique. Deprojection of the nose widens the nasal base and alters nostril shape. The vertical alar redundancy (A) has been repositioned (B), resulting in an almond-shaped nostril with a shift in axis. No wedge or sill excision was performed.
A, The preoperative nostril axis is vertically oriented; B, the postoperative axis is more oblique. Deprojection of the nose widens the nasal base and alters nostril shape. The vertical alar redundancy (A) has been repositioned (B), resulting in an almond-shaped nostril with a shift in axis. No wedge or sill excision was performed.

Figure 12.
Deprojection and wedge excision. A, Preoperative view. B, Two-year postoperative view: the nostril has not been violated, and there is no excess nasal flare. C, Seven-year postoperative view shows a consistent result.
Deprojection and wedge excision. A, Preoperative view. B, Two-year postoperative view: the nostril has not been violated, and there is no excess nasal flare. C, Seven-year postoperative view shows a consistent result.

When incisions of the nasal base are strategically placed, scars can become imperceptible. However, incisions may be visible for a variety of reasons, especially if they violate the internal alar border and go into the nostril. We strongly disagree with techniques described in the literature that enter the nostril opening via the lateral ala (Figure 13). Incisions into the nostril should only be placed when excess nasal sill is present, and then only through the horizontal portion of the nasal sill and not via a lateral approach. One must always consider the effects of nostril reduction on the nasal aperture so that nasal sill excision does not contribute to nasal airway obstruction. Therefore, we recommend thorough evaluation and meticulous technique when undertaking base reduction.

Figure 13.
A “tear-drop” or “Q” deformity (A; arrow) may result from excisions of the lateral alar wall (B; adapted from Szachowicz and Kridel6). One must “preserve the curve” of the alar rim when performing wedge excisions. In this patient, too much alar flare has been removed, resulting in a straightened lateral ala, and the base reduction incision has violated the internal alar rim.
A “tear-drop” or “Q” deformity (A; arrow) may result from excisions of the lateral alar wall (B; adapted from Szachowicz and Kridel6). One must “preserve the curve” of the alar rim when performing wedge excisions. In this patient, too much alar flare has been removed, resulting in a straightened lateral ala, and the base reduction incision has violated the internal alar rim.

To simplify the approach to the nasal base, we recommend focusing on alar flaring, sill excess, and overall nasal base width. As mentioned previously herein, nasal base width should roughly approximate the intercanthal distance in the Caucasian nose and should be larger in the African American or ethnic nose. Once it has been determined that the alar base is too wide, one can tailor their approach (Figure 14).

Figure 14.
Algorithm to determine performing wedge excision alone, wedge excision plus sill excision, or wedge excision plus sill excision plus V-Y advancement
Algorithm to determine performing wedge excision alone, wedge excision plus sill excision, or wedge excision plus sill excision plus V-Y advancement

When performing wedge excisions (Figure 15), mark out skin incisions in the alar-facial groove to “preserve the curve” as diagrammed in Figure 3, or a teardrop deformity may result (Figure 13). To ensure a balanced excision, preoperative marking and calipers are very useful in the planning of wedge and sill excisions. Caution must be taken to avoid excising too much flare or the alae will look straight as they join the alar-facial groove. If sill excisions are not being done, make sure the incision does not violate the nostril. After injection (lidocaine hydrochloride with 1:100 000 epinephrine), a No. 15 blade is used to incise the wedge of tissue. Care is taken not to violate the muscle deep to the skin. Needle-point cautery is used for hemostasis. Careful reapproximation is necessary to avoid a step-off deformity (this is more common with sill excisions than with wedge excisions). An absorbable braided suture (5-0 Vicryl [polyglactin 910]) is placed in the deep tissue layer to relieve any tension on the edges of the incision, and 6-0 Prolene sutures are used for the cutaneous layer (Figure 12, Figure 15, Figure 16, and Figure 17). Particular attention is paid to everting wound edges along the sill region. If reapproximation of the incisional edges results in flattening or overstraightening of the ala, consider a modest V-Y advancement as described later in this article.

Figure 15.
Alar wedge excision. Deep 5-0 Vicryl [polyglactin 910] suture placement decreases skin edge tension. Closure is accomplished with simple interrupted 6-0 Prolene sutures.
Alar wedge excision. Deep 5-0 Vicryl [polyglactin 910] suture placement decreases skin edge tension. Closure is accomplished with simple interrupted 6-0 Prolene sutures.

Figure 16.
Alar wedge resection. A, Wedge excision completed on the left and planned on right. Note the alar flare, the incision in the alar-facial groove, and the preservation of the nostril sill. B, Wedge excision. C, Placement of deep stitch. D, Simple interrupted closure. E, Reduced flare (base view). F and H, Preoperative photos showing alar flare. G and I, Incisions are well healed at 1-month follow-up. Note that some of the curvature of the lateral ala is preserved to maintain a natural appearance. Too great a removal causes lateral alar straightening. At no point does this incision enter the nostril opening.
Alar wedge resection. A, Wedge excision completed on the left and planned on right. Note the alar flare, the incision in the alar-facial groove, and the preservation of the nostril sill. B, Wedge excision. C, Placement of deep stitch. D, Simple interrupted closure. E, Reduced flare (base view). F and H, Preoperative photos showing alar flare. G and I, Incisions are well healed at 1-month follow-up. Note that some of the curvature of the lateral ala is preserved to maintain a natural appearance. Too great a removal causes lateral alar straightening. At no point does this incision enter the nostril opening.

Figure 17.
A and C, Preoperative views of alar flaring; B and D, minimal evidence of incisions (wedge incisions only) at 10-day follow-up.
A and C, Preoperative views of alar flaring; B and D, minimal evidence of incisions (wedge incisions only) at 10-day follow-up.

Sill excisions are most commonly performed with wedge excisions, with or without V-Y advancement (Figure 14). Though sill excisions could theoretically be performed alone or with a V-Y advancement, none of the procedures performed in our alar base series were done without wedge excisions. When planning the incision for the enlarged nasal sill, the most natural appearing results occur when the resection of the sill does not extend laterally past the long axis of the nostril or does not include too much of the vestibular lining (Figure 3). Care should be taken to avoid the mesial crus of the lower lateral cartilage. Additional undermining of the tissues is recommended at the nasal sill to avoid nostril notching. A 6-0 Prolene suture is used to precisely reapproximate the nostril border, and a deep 5-0 Vicryl suture is used, particularly to evert the skin edges at the nasal sill (Figure 4 and Figure 18).

Figure 18.
Intraoperative views of alar wedge and sill excisions. A, Both alar flaring and sill excess are present. B, Open rhinoplasty is performed with increased tip projection and a modest change in the nostril shape. C, Incisions are placed to remove flare and to enter the nasal sill medially to the alar insertions, preserving the lateral ala. On the patient’s left (C), flare and sill excisions have been carried out, and markings show the planned excision on the patient’s right. The oblique marking line (C) is useful for realigning the alar segment after the sill excess has been removed. D, Flare and sill reduction are completed bilaterally.
Intraoperative views of alar wedge and sill excisions. A, Both alar flaring and sill excess are present. B, Open rhinoplasty is performed with increased tip projection and a modest change in the nostril shape. C, Incisions are placed to remove flare and to enter the nasal sill medially to the alar insertions, preserving the lateral ala. On the patient’s left (C), flare and sill excisions have been carried out, and markings show the planned excision on the patient’s right. The oblique marking line (C) is useful for realigning the alar segment after the sill excess has been removed. D, Flare and sill reduction are completed bilaterally.

V-Y advancement is performed after either of the 2 maneuvers described herein (wedge or wedge with sill excision) (Figure 3 and Figure 4). If sill excisions have been performed, the nostril sill must first be reapproximated with a single 6-0 Prolene suture. The lateral aspect of the open alar wedge incision is then drawn into the nasolabial fold with a single-pronged skin hook. Simple, interrupted 6-0 Prolene sutures approximate the ”V” to create the stem of the “Y” within the nasolabial crease (Figure 5B). The more sutures that are placed along the stem of the “Y,” the further the ala will be medialized. In 3 days every other suture is removed, and at 5 days all sutures are removed (Figure 19, Figure 20, Figure 21, Figure 22, and Figure 23). Healing is surprisingly good, despite the density of sebaceous glands in this region. Indications for dermabrasion are noticeable or irregular scars present after 6 weeks.

Figure 19.
The V-Y advancement can narrow the alar base insertion while placing incisions within the nasolabial fold.
The V-Y advancement can narrow the alar base insertion while placing incisions within the nasolabial fold.

Figure 20.
The V-Y advancement after wedge and sill excisions. A, After the nostril rim is reapproximated, a single-prong skin hook is used to draw skin excess into the nasolabial fold. B, Usually three to four 6-0 Prolene sutures are used to create the stem of the “Y.” This will medialize the alar rim. C, At least 2 mm of medialization is achieved on the right side with V-Y advancement. Sill and flare excision and ala medialization with the V-Y advancement have been accomplished on the patient’s left side. Incisions are planned on the patient’s right side. Note the reduced sill width on the left side. D, Postoperative V-Y medialization of the alar insertion. E, The number of sutures in the stem of the “Y” will determine the degree of medialization.
The V-Y advancement after wedge and sill excisions. A, After the nostril rim is reapproximated, a single-prong skin hook is used to draw skin excess into the nasolabial fold. B, Usually three to four 6-0 Prolene sutures are used to create the stem of the “Y.” This will medialize the alar rim. C, At least 2 mm of medialization is achieved on the right side with V-Y advancement. Sill and flare excision and ala medialization with the V-Y advancement have been accomplished on the patient’s left side. Incisions are planned on the patient’s right side. Note the reduced sill width on the left side. D, Postoperative V-Y medialization of the alar insertion. E, The number of sutures in the stem of the “Y” will determine the degree of medialization.

Figure 21.
Wedge excision, sill excision, and V-Y advancement. A and C, Preoperative views; B and D, 6 months after the procedure. Increased projection has also been achieved with a columellar strut, a medial crural base plumping graft, and a tip graft. Notice the change in nostril axis (A and B) with increased tip projection and narrowing of the interalar distance. The horizontal nostril axis is a general indication for nasal sill excision. No dermabrasion of incisions was performed postoperatively as the stem of the “Y” is well hidden in the nasolabial fold.
Wedge excision, sill excision, and V-Y advancement. A and C, Preoperative views; B and D, 6 months after the procedure. Increased projection has also been achieved with a columellar strut, a medial crural base plumping graft, and a tip graft. Notice the change in nostril axis (A and B) with increased tip projection and narrowing of the interalar distance. The horizontal nostril axis is a general indication for nasal sill excision. No dermabrasion of incisions was performed postoperatively as the stem of the “Y” is well hidden in the nasolabial fold.

Figure 22.
This patient underwent increased tip projection, alar wedge excision, sill excision, and V-Y advancement. A and E, Preoperative views reveal increased alar flare, sill, and interalar distance. B and F, Seven months after the procedure. The interalar distance has decreased postoperatively. C and D, No dermabrasion was performed because the stem of the “Y” is almost imperceptible in the nasolabial fold.
This patient underwent increased tip projection, alar wedge excision, sill excision, and V-Y advancement. A and E, Preoperative views reveal increased alar flare, sill, and interalar distance. B and F, Seven months after the procedure. The interalar distance has decreased postoperatively. C and D, No dermabrasion was performed because the stem of the “Y” is almost imperceptible in the nasolabial fold.

Figure 23.
This patient underwent increased tip projection, wedge excision, and V-Y advancement with postoperative dermabrasion for scarring. A and E, Preoperative views reveal increased alar flare, sill, and interalar distance. B and F, Postoperative views. C and D, Incisions are imperceptible after dermabrasion.
This patient underwent increased tip projection, wedge excision, and V-Y advancement with postoperative dermabrasion for scarring. A and E, Preoperative views reveal increased alar flare, sill, and interalar distance. B and F, Postoperative views. C and D, Incisions are imperceptible after dermabrasion.

RESULTS

Of the 124 medical charts reviewed, 31 patients (25%) were men and 93 (75%) were women (Table 1). Average follow-up was 2 years. All patients underwent wedge excision; 64 (51.6%) underwent alar wedge excision alone; 21 (16.9%), alar wedge and nasal sill excision; 19 (15.3%), alar wedge excision with V-Y advancement; and 20 (16.1%), alar wedge excision, nasal sill excision, and V-Y advancement. Thirty-one patients (25.0%) received dermabrasion postoperatively for raised wedge excision scars. Wedge excision removed an average of 4.6 mm of tissue from each side, whereas nasal sill excision removed an average of 3.4 mm of tissue from each side. Twenty-one patients (16.9%) were undergoing a revision septorhinoplasty, and 103 patients (83.1%) were undergoing primary procedures. Ethnic distribution is given in Table 1. One patient (Caucasian) was noted to have a complication of residual suture track marks that required direct excision. Two patients required additional wedge excisions postoperatively for persistent nasal flare. One patient had raised incisions but did not return for dermabrasion.

Patients of each wedge resection subgroup requiring dermabrasion were compared with one another (Table 2). When compared with the group that received wedge excisions alone, only the group that underwent wedge and sill excision showed a statistically significant increase in the incidence of dermabrasion (P = .02). Dermabrasion was performed both along the wedge and sill portion of the incision when scars were conspicuous.

COMMENT

The history of alar base reduction reveals a great variety of surgical maneuvers. It has been known for some time that notching deformities may result from this endeavor.1, 6, 9-10 We believe that incision location is the primary reason for notching and nostril deformity. One technique described by Peck et al24 preserves the vestibular skin when resecting a triangle of tissue from the cutaneous nasal base, resulting in an intranasal “dog ear.” The redundancy flattens over time, leaving a closure that is resistant to notching.

Another factor noted by some to contribute to notching is carrying the modified Weir incision into the deep muscle layer in the alar base,10 though some authors describe using this technique of muscle transection when performing the alar cinch procedure described by Millard.25 This technique is used primarily for patients undergoing surgery for cleft lip, and it makes use of laterally pedicled alar flaps. The tissue is deepithelialized and inset medially in the nostril floor to effect narrowing of the nasal base. For stability of the closure, the flaps are sutured to the columella.2, 25 We consider this to be a combination of a sill excision and an alar bunching technique.

Daniel2 discusses a nasal base reduction modification of the procedure described by Sheen11 that classifies wedge excisions according to postoperative objectives. A type I wedge excision is limited to the alar base and will reduce alar flare only. Type II wedge excisions involve both the alar base and the nostril sill, hence decreasing both the nasal base and the nostril size. Type III wedge excisions include the alar base and nostril sill and extend into the nostril floor to achieve a decrease in interalar width.2

An additional technique described to minimize postoperative asymmetry is the “Calibrated Weir Operation” as described by Cinelli.26 It involves drawing a midcolumellar line from the nasolabial angle to the midpoint of the upper vermillion border, then bisecting this line and the columella with another perpendicular line. From the intersection of the 2 lines, one may measure the distance to the medial and lateral borders of a nasal base excision.

Overall, our alar base reduction techniques of wedge excision, sill excision, and V-Y advancement have resulted in a high degree of patient satisfaction. We propose a simple algorithm (Figure 14) to yield a consistent and reliable tool for the rhinoplastic surgeon. Our goal is to accomplish a natural result and preserve the natural curvature of the lateral ala. Furthermore, preoperative counseling and adjusting patient expectations about the potential need for dermabrasion is critical to patient satisfaction. It is also important to realize that one may decrease nasal flare by increasing tip projection or by increasing tip rotation; hence, it is important to perform base reductions as the last maneuver in the procedure.

In our experience 15% to 20% of deprojection rhinoplasties require wedge resections. This is similar to what is reported by Rees27 and Gilbert.28 Additional nasal base reduction maneuvers described Tardy et al9 include excision of the nostril floor internal to the nose and without violating the sill region.

Outcomes in our patient series were improved with the use of dermabrasion in the alar-facial groove in 25% of patients. Increased density of sebaceous glands in the area of the alar-facial groove undoubtedly plays a role in the visibility of Weir incisions. We did not find that scarring incidence increased when adjusting for ethnicity or sex (Table 1). In general, the literature also discusses skin incision placement 1 to 1.5 mm anterior to the highly sebaceous alar-facial groove.1-2,8-9 However, we have found that these incisions may also be quite visible. This patient population underwent incisions placed within the alar-facial groove, which may have contributed to the increased need for postoperative dermabrasion. Of note, incisions placed in the nasal sill, when combined with wedge excisions, were most likely to require dermabrasion (Table 2). This emphasizes the importance of careful placement of sill incision and proper eversion of these wound edges.

One could speculate that the large ethnic population (44%) of our patient series may contribute to the increased use of dermabrasion. However, the data do not statistically support that premise because 19% of Caucasian patients also underwent dermabrasion. One may also consider that the ethnicity demographics could be skewed based on the lack of appropriate categorization. The increasing rise of interracial couples often blurs the lines of distinction between ethnic groups. Ethnicity declared by the patient may not fully reflect the ethnic diversity of their parents (Table 1).

The V-Y advancement described by Bernstein29 has been particularly useful when additional narrowing of the nasal base cannot be accomplished by the wedge and sill excisions alone. The wedge excision may reduce the appearance of the nasal base width from the frontal view; however, it does not significantly change the interalar distance. Surprisingly, there has been little mention of this technique in the literature since 1975. In our series we used this technique in 31% of patients.

Measuring before removal of tissue and careful reapproximation of skin edges can minimize asymmetry. Exact symmetry may not always be possible.8 To avoid this problem, we feel that deep sutures are helpful to appropriately reapproximate the mobilized ala. Caution should be exercised in the nasal base that has a preoperative asymmetry. We feel that with the exception of cleft lip and trauma, most nostril asymmetries are attributable to correctable causes (tip or columellar deflection, nasal masses).23 Asymmetrical alar flare without history of trauma, surgery, or congenital cleft lip or mass is extremely rare.

Unilateral alar base reduction may be of use in patients with cleft lip, particularly if the nasal floor is too wide or if excessive flare is present. In addition to the techniques described in this section, Mazzola30 describes a Z-plasty that appears to effect a similar change. Using vestibular lining, a columellar-based flap Z-plasty is designed to move the alar insertion medially. The rotated flap places the intranasal skin lateral to the ala, allowing significant medialization.

Bafaqeeh and Al-Quattan31 present an interesting discussion on the potential devascularization of the nasal flap when open rhinoplasty is combined with alar base resections. Recognizing the 5 major arteries of the nose (Dorsal nasal artery, external nasal branch of the anterior ethmoidal artery, lateral nasal artery, alar branches of the angular artery, and the columellar artery), he recommends keeping the alar base excision below the alar groove and degloving the nasal skin superficial to the lateral crura to avoid damage to the lateral nasal arteries. Also, defatting of the nasal tip was discouraged to preserve the nasal tip plexus. We have not found devascularization of the nasal tip to be an issue in this patient series. To preserve nasal blood supply, we recommend leaving the deep musculature intact.

The rhinoplastic surgeon must also take into consideration the risk of further nasal airway obstruction when narrowing the nasal base or nostrils. It has been shown via acoustic rhinometry that reduction rhinoplasty can reduce the cross-sectional area at the nasal valve 22% to 25%.32 To maintain the nasal airway, the rhinoplastic surgeon is encouraged to consider the use of spreader grafts and turbinate reductions. An interesting study performed by Khosh et al33 noted that in a series of 53 patients with nasal valve obstruction, 79% of the obstructions were determined to be caused by previous rhinoplasty.

In addition to the inherent risk of nasal airway obstruction that comes with rhinoplasty, one must be aware of the potential for worsening the airway by narrowing the opening into the nostrils with sill excision or V-Y advancement. If any doubt exists concerning postoperative functional or cosmetic outcomes from nasal base excision, defer this portion of the procedure for 6 to 8 weeks. At that time the nose may be reevaluated, and minor nasal base excisions can be performed in the office if deemed necessary.9-10

In conclusion, conservative wedge excisions are useful for the appropriately selected patient with excess alar flare. Nasal sill excisions are effective for decreasing the size of a nostril and converting horizontal nostril axes to those that are more vertically oriented. Moreover, the V-Y advancement techniques described by Bernstein29 are reliable and predictable methods of medializing the nasal base. What makes the ala look natural is a preservation of the lateral curve without a visible incision that violates the nostril laterally. As this is a procedure of millimeters, subtlety and conservatism are paramount. When appropriately implemented, reduction of the nasal base is a valuable adjunct for advanced rhinoplasty.

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Correspondence: Russell W. H. Kridel, MD, 6655 Travis St, Suite 900, Houston, TX 77030 (rkridel@todaysface.com).

Accepted for Publication: November 16, 2004.

Previous Presentation: This study was presented at the Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meeting; May 1, 2004; Scottsdale, Ariz.

References
1.
Adamson  PASmith  OTropper  GJMcGraw  B Analysis of alar base narrowing. Am J Cosmet Surg 1990;7239- 243
2.
Daniel  RKRhinoplasty. New York, NY Little Brown1993;307- 312
3.
Becker  DGWeinberger  MSGreene  BATardy  ME Clinical study of alar anatomy and surgery of the alar base. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123789- 795
PubMedArticle
4.
McCollough  EGAltering the Alar Base: Nasal Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia, Pa WB Saunders Co1994;247- 255
5.
Rohrich  RJMuzaffar  AR Rhinoplasty in the African-American patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;1111322- 1339
PubMedArticle
6.
Szachowicz  EKridel  RW Adjunctive measures to rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1987;20895- 912
PubMed
7.
Powell  NPHumphries  BProportions of the Aesthetic Face. New York, NY Thieme-Stratton Inc1984;8
8.
Porter  JP The average African American male face. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;678- 81
PubMedArticle
9.
Tardy  MEPatt  BSWalter  MA Alar reduction and sculpture: anatomic concepts. Facial Plast Surg 1993;9295- 305
PubMedArticle
10.
Tebbets  JBPrimary Rhinoplasty: A New Approach to the Logic and the Techniques. St Louis, Mo CV Mosby Co1998;481- 492
11.
Sheen  JHAesthetic Rhinoplasty. St Louis, Mo CV Mosby Co1978;
12.
Weir  RF On restoring sunken noses without scarring the face. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1988;12203- 206
PubMedArticle
13.
Joseph  JNasenplastik und sonstige Gesichtsplastik nebst enim Anhang Über Mamaplastik. Leipzig, Germany Curt Kabitzsh1931;110- 113
14.
Aufricht  G A few hints and surgical details in rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 1943;57317- 335
15.
Bernstein  L Esthetic anatomy of the nose. Laryngoscope 1972;821323- 1330
PubMedArticle
16.
Crumley  RL Aesthetics and surgery of the nasal base. Facial Plast Surg 1988;5135- 142
PubMedArticle
17.
Anderson  JR A reasoned approach to nasal base surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 1984;110349- 358
PubMedArticle
18.
Farkas  LGHreczko  TADeutsch  CK Objective assessment of standard nostril types: a morphometric study. Ann Plast Surg 1983;11381- 389
PubMedArticle
19.
Porter  JPOlson  KL Analysis of the African American female nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111620- 626
PubMedArticle
20.
Sim  RSSmith  JDChan  AS Comparison of the aesthetic facial proportions of southern Chinese and white women. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2000;2113- 120
PubMedArticle
21.
Choe  KSSclafani  APLitner  JAYu  GRomo  T The Korean American woman’s face. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6244- 252
PubMedArticle
22.
Brissett  AESherris  DA Changing the nostril shape. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2000;8433- 445
23.
Liu  ESKridel  RWH Evaluation of nasoalveolar cysts for the facial plastic surgeon. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003;5185- 188
PubMedArticle
24.
Peck  GCGruber  RMichelson  LN Alar wedge excisions. Peck  GCGruber  RRhinoplasty: State of the Art. St Louis, Mo Mosby1993;139- 150
25.
Millard  DR The alar cinch in the flat, flaring nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980;65669- 672
PubMedArticle
26.
Cinelli  JA Calibrated Weir operation. Arch Otolaryngol 1961;74189- 191
PubMedArticle
27.
Rees  TD Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.  Philadelphia, Pa WB Saunders Co1980;243- 273
28.
Gilbert  SE Alar reductions in rhinoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;122781- 784
PubMedArticle
29.
Bernstein  L Rhinoplasty for the negroid nose. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1975;8783- 795
PubMed
30.
Mazzola  RF Secondary unilateral cleft lip nose: the external approach. Facial Plast Surg 1996;12367- 378
PubMedArticle
31.
Bafaqeeh  SAAl-Quattan  MM Simultaneous open rhinoplasty and alar base excision: is there a problem with the blood supply of the nasal tip and columellar skin? Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105344- 347
PubMedArticle
32.
Grymer  LF Reduction rhinoplasty and nasal patency: change in cross-sectional area of the nose evaluated by acoustic rhinometry. Laryngoscope 1995;105429- 431
PubMedArticle
33.
Khosh  MMJen  AHonrado  CPearlman  SJ Nasal valve reconstruction. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6167- 181
PubMedArticle
×