[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.147.238.168. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Editor's Correspondence
Jan 28, 2013

Social Desirability Bias in Self-rated Presenteeism Among Resident Physicians—Reply

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Jena); and Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (Drs Press and Arora).

JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(2):165-166. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1418

In reply

Dr Ting highlights a potentially important limitation of our survey of presenteeism among resident physicians1: the desire of survey respondents to report socially desirable reasons for working when ill, such as altruism toward patients and colleagues. While we agree that this bias likely exists, we believe its magnitude is small for several reasons. First, we would expect social desirability bias to exist primarily in surveys that are not conducted anonymously. Second, while residents may be more likely to report altruistic reasons for presenteeism because their attendance at the conference is known to their residency program, we believe this to be unlikely. For this to occur, residents would have to believe that the aggregated results of the survey would be seen by their program directors and would result in sanctions, despite no links to an individual resident's survey response. Third, in a national, mail-based, anonymous survey of residents in 2009, we found nearly identical rates of presenteeism.2 This provides empirical support that social desirability bias in our current survey is not large.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×