[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.92.62. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 422
Citations 0
Editor's Correspondence
Mar 11, 2013

Cultural Capital: Accounting for Power in Patient-Physician Interactions

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences (Dr Ackerman), Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Auer), and Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Gonzales), University of California, San Francisco.

JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(5):393-394. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2167

Current research on patient-clinician communication points to the persistent challenge of realizing the principles of “shared decision making.” The recent report titled “Communicating with Physicians About Medical Decisions: A Reluctance to Disagree,” for example, suggests that even socioeconomically advantaged, highly “activated” patients are reluctant to express disagreement with a physician.1 The same patients reported that they would be comfortable asking questions and discussing their preferences with physicians. The question of what makes certain practices and forms of speech possible for different types of people in particular contexts was addressed in rich detail some 40 years ago by the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu. We hope that by offering a brief glimpse into the treasure chest of Bourdieu's theories about human behavior, a “new” way of understanding patient-clinician communication will be made available to interested readers.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×