[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Invited Commentary
March 2014

Moving Toward Evidence-Based Complementary Care

Author Affiliations
  • 1Harvard Medical School
  • 2Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(3):368-369. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12995

Therapies that lie outside the spectrum of traditional, science-based clinical medicine and surgery are often labeled as complementary or alternative. These therapies range from herbal remedies and dietary supplements to meditation and acupuncture, and they derive from Eastern and Western traditions. Use is widespread and often promoted by commercial interests and practitioners, with prevalence estimates exceeding 50%.1 Their popularity derives in part from being available without prescription and the supposition that the label of natural makes them safe and preferable to pharmacologic and surgical treatments.2 Despite widespread use, many complementary therapies still lack a rigorous evidence base.3

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview