[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.166.89.187. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 153
Citations 0
Comment & Response
May 2014

AACE Response to Viewpoint of December 9, 2013

Author Affiliations
  • 1American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, Jacksonville, Florida
  • 2American College of Endocrinology, Jacksonville, Florida
  • 3Diabetes and Endocrine Associates, La Jolla, California
JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):827. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.193

To the Editor The Viewpoint by Gionfriddo et al1 regarding the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Comprehensive Diabetes Management Algorithm reflects a failure to differentiate between an algorithm and a guideline. They conflate algorithms with guidelines and argue against this nonexistent straw man. What we published is explicitly an algorithm, entitled an algorithm, and not a guideline, which is explicitly defined and governed by our own published protocols.2 In fact, our algorithm directs readers to previously published guidelines as needed.3 Algorithms are evidence- and nuance-based clinical practice tools, derived from extant guidelines and new information, to optimize care. More specifically, algorithms rely on diverse layers of evidence in order to clarify complicated management decisions, the totality of which cannot be exclusively guided by published randomized clinical trials or other higher levels of evidence. Thus, responsible clinical decision making requires that each patient encounter uses all available evidence; to do otherwise is to abdicate clinical responsibility for patient care.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×