[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 50.16.107.222. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 207
Citations 0
Comment & Response
May 2014

Identifying Livestock-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococus Aureus in the United States—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 3Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 2Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 4Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 5Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania
JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):825. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.37

In Reply We appreciate the opportunity to respond to Perencevich et al. We emphasize several differences between our work and that of Feingold and colleagues, to which they refer in their letter. We studied methicillin-resistant Staphylococus aureus (MRSA) infection in a general population representative group and compared them with patients without MRSA infection. Feingold et al studied MRSA colonization and compared people with ST398 with people with other strains. The inferences that can be made from these 2 studies are substantially different.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×