[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.124.106. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 141
Citations 0
Comment & Response
July 2014

Sexual Activity in Midlife Women and Beyond—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Center for Research on Healthcare, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • 2Department of Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System
JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(7):1205. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1592

In Reply We appreciate and read with interest the thought-provoking letters submitted to the editor in regard to our Research Letter.1

Maiorino et al expressed concern about excluding sexually inactive women at baseline. For this analysis, we were interested in the factors associated with continuation of sexual activity at midlife, so we necessarily only included women who were sexually active at baseline. They also noted that the 0.5 difference in Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scores between women who became sexually inactive and women who remained sexually active was not significant. We agree, and that is why we concluded that FSFI scores did not differ significantly between these 2 groups. The mean (SD) FSFI scores among women who became sexually inactive vs women who remained sexually active were 21.8 (3.8) and 22.3 (3.8), respectively (P = .67). In this cohort, 92.3% of the women had an FSFI score below 27, consistent with a designation of sexual dysfunction.2

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×