[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.147.238.168. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Invited Commentary
December 2014

Virtual QualityThe Failure of Public Reporting and Pay-for-Performance Programs

Author Affiliations
  • 1Christus St Vincent Regional Medical Center, Santa Fe, New Mexico
JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(12):1912-1913. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3403

Is there too much focus on measuring and reporting quality rather than on the conditions needed for improving it? The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and other organizations require physicians and hospitals to publicly report performance on quality measures, and the CMS and private payers are tying reimbursement partly to data from such measures in pay-for-performance programs. However, as the director of an intensive care unit performance improvement program, I know that it is difficult—and sometimes counterproductive—to try to improve a complex system simply by rewarding or penalizing the results.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×