[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.179.146. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Clinical Observation
October 25, 2004

International Normalized Ratio Increase Before Warfarin-Associated HemorrhageBrief and Subtle

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Cardiovascular Division (Drs Kucher, Beckman, and Goldhaber and Mss Connolly and Cheng) and Pharmacy Department (Ms Tsilimingras and Mr Fanikos), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(19):2176-2179. doi:10.1001/archinte.164.19.2176
Abstract

Objective  To determine the relationship between serial international normalized ratios (INRs) in patients who have been undergoing long-term anticoagulation and the onset of warfarin-associated bleeding complications.

Methods  The study cohort consisted of 2391 patients treated in the Anticoagulation Service at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass, from April 1999 through July 2003. For each patient with a bleeding event, we selected 2 controls who were matched for age, sex, indication for warfarin therapy, and duration of enrollment in our Anticoagulation Service.

Results  Warfarin-related hemorrhage occurred in 32 patients (1.3%). The mean ± SD INRs at the time of the bleeding event or matched patient’s event date (5.9 ± 5.9 vs 2.3 ± 0.7; P<.001) and the mean±SD last INRs before the bleeding event or matched patient’s event date (3.0 ± 1.2 vs 2.1 ± 0.8; P<.001) were higher in the patients than in the controls. The last INRs before the bleeding event were obtained an average of 11.6 ± 17.8 (mean ± SD) days before the event in the patients and 18.3 ± 28.0 (mean ± SD) days before the matched date in the controls (P = .22). The mean second-to-last INRs were similar in both groups (2.8 ± 2.1 vs 2.3 ± 0.8; P = .11). When the INRs were plotted in relation to the time before the onset of bleeding, a marked increase in the patients’ INRs was observed shortly before the bleeding began.

Conclusions  Serial INRs are poor predictors of hemorrhagic events. There appears to be only a brief warning period during which a slightly elevated INR predicts an imminent bleeding event.

×