[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.168.87. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Editor's Correspondence
November 08, 2004

A Single-Payer National Health Insurance: We Gave Twice at the Office

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(20):2281-2283. doi:10.1001/archinte.164.20.2281-a

From the results of a survey, McCormick et al1 conclude that a single-payer national health insurance is more acceptable to physicians than a managed care or fee-for-service system. Part of this conclusion was based on the willingness of physicians to accept a 10% fee reduction or a 10% salary reduction in exchange for the postulated benefits of the new payment method including, most significantly, paper work reduction. Of the physicians surveyed, 67% stated that they would accept a fee reduction and 57% would accept a salary reduction. Why two thirds of physicians accepted a system that is likely to cost them twice as much was not explained.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×