[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 321
Citations 0
Comment & Response
May 2015

Insertion Site for Central Venous Catheters

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
  • 2Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Epidemiology & Infection Control, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence
  • 3Department of Biostatistics & Clinical Research, Côte de Nacre University Hospital Center, Caen, France
  • 4Risques Microbiens, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Caen Basse-Normandie, Caen, France
JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(5):861-862. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.36

To the Editor Patel and colleagues1(p1726) wrote that central venous catheters should be placed in the internal jugular vein “which carries a lower risk of infection than the subclavian route.” This statement is unsubstantiated from studies published to date, and this is not the recommendation in recent guidelines.2,3 For short-term, nontunneled central venous catheters inserted in the intensive care unit, our meta-analysis suggested that subclavian insertion is associated with a lower risk of infection.4 In addition, the anatomic site used to insert a port for administration of chemotherapy had no effect on infectious and noninfectious complications.5 Ultimately, decisions regarding which anatomic site to insert a central venous catheter depend on patient-specific risk factors (eg, obesity, bleeding diathesis, hyperinflation of the lungs), availability of ultrasound guidance, and experience of the inserter.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview