[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.167.149.128. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 1,659
Citations 0
Invited Commentary
July 2015

Should Malpractice Settlements Be Secret?

Author Affiliations
  • 1Stanford Law School, Stanford, California
  • 2Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
  • 3Todd & Weld LLP, Boston, Massachusetts
JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(7):1135-1137. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1038

In this issue of JAMA Internal Medicine, Sage et al1 report a novel study of nondisclosure provisions among Texas malpractice settlement agreements. Nearly all the settlements contained at least one type of disclosure restriction, and approximately 40% barred claimants from discussing the facts surrounding their injury. Nearly a quarter prohibited claimants from alerting a professional regulatory body to what happened.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×