[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.204.161.30. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 614
Citations 0
Invited Commentary
Health Care Reform
July 2015

Medicare Fee Cuts and Hospital- vs Office-Based Cardiovascular Imaging Services

Author Affiliations
  • 1Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco
  • 2American College of Cardiology, Aurora, Colorado
JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(7):1231-1232. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2021

With the need and desire for Congress and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to reduce the nation’s unsustainable financial burden of Medicare, substantial reduction in payments of many imaging tests and procedures has been implemented for in-office provision of these services. Imaging was chosen because of the exponential increase in volume of imaging services in the past decade without any data suggesting better outcomes or increased need for such services. Song and colleagues1 show that imaging services have shifted to the higher-paying hospital setting from office-based imaging.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×