[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.87.3. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 592
Citations 0
Invited Commentary
August 2015

Time to Test Incentives to Increase Organ Donation

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • 2Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(8):1329-1330. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2200

In 1987, when the United Network for Organ Sharing began keeping records, there was a gap between supply of organs and demand. With time, that gap has become a chasm. Last year, more than 120 000 people were in need of a kidney, liver, heart, or lung; roughly 7000 of them died while waiting.1

During the past 2 decades, states have tried several ways to encourage nondirected organ donation from deceased and living donors. These methods have included, for example, a state tax deduction for expenses incurred by living donors. But do such policies wield a meaningful effect? In this issue, Chatterjee and colleagues,2 to our knowledge, conduct the first examination of the national effect of a variety of policies on organ donation, and find that the policies barely made a dent.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×