[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.92.62. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 139
Citations 0
Comment & Response
September 2015

Ongoing Attention to Injurious Inpatient Falls and Pressure Ulcers—Reply

Teresa M. Waters, PhD1; Michael J. Daniels, ScD2,3; Gloria J. Bazzoli, PhD4; et al for the Hospital Responses to Medicare’s Nonpayment for Preventable Complications (HRMNPC) Team
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis
  • 2Department of Statistics & Data Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin
  • 3Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin
  • 4Department of Health Administration, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(9):1582. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2568

In Reply We agree with Lee and Soumerai that transparency is needed when evaluating payment policies to ensure that actual outcomes from a policy change match intended outcomes. The best way to ensure transparency is to conduct multiple evaluations, using different hospitals and databases. Deriving different results from a prior study by Lee et al1 does not necessarily mean our findings are wrong. Given the narrow confidence intervals around our findings and that we controlled for multiple hospital- and unit-level covariates, we believe the methodological concerns raised did not influence our findings. Rather, the location and teaching status of the 1381 hospitals contributing data to our study were quite different from the 398 hospitals in their study. The increased heterogeneity in our data likely provided more opportunity to identify the effects of the policy change.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×