Views 922
Citations 0
Editor's Note
February 2016

Teaching High-Value Care on RoundsModeling Moderation

Author Affiliations

Copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(2):262-263. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6982

There is consensus among medical education leaders that trainees must learn the principles of cost consciousness and resource stewardship.1,2 However, during teaching rounds, residents and students can derive an ambivalent approach to value. Particularly in academic centers where resources seem limitless, attending physicians often suggest additional tests that expand exhaustive differential diagnoses. This builds on trainees’ gnawing fear of missing something to establish thoroughness as an unrestrained virtue. The pressures of individualized quality metrics along with compressed inpatient evaluations to minimize length of stay may further reinforce this mindset and encourage defensive testing. These practices contradict and displace discussions of value.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview