[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 341
Citations 0
Comment & Response
January 2016

Unreliable Conclusions of Breast Cancer Screening, Incidence, and Mortality

Author Affiliations
  • 1Society of Breast Imaging, American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia
JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(1):140-141. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7204

To the Editor Harding et al1 use ecological analysis to assess an important and complex issue. The authors would judge mammography outcomes but lack key information to draw reliable conclusions. They do not know which women actually had mammograms or which cancers were detected by screening. The report relies on self-reporting of mammography, the accuracy of which is questionable. They assume fairly uniform populations, which is unlikely. Lacking longitudinal data, the authors have no idea whether the rate of advanced cancers declined. In fact, there are numerous confounding factors that could make their analysis irrelevant.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×