[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.159.27. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Editor's Correspondence
June 28, 2010

Patient-Centric Colorectal Cancer Screening Improvement Strategies

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliation: Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(12):1088-1089. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.157

Cost containment issues engender innovative approaches to health care delivery. Simon et al1 are to be congratulated for recognizing and capitalizing on a naturally occurring experiment. Although there may have been some methodological limitations in their study (eg, of the 80 000 patients who were randomized, only 20 938 were included in the analyses), the final result—that an automated telephone outreach with speech recognition (ATO) intervention failed to increase rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening—contributes to the evidence base on effective vs ineffective screening improvement interventions.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×