Citations 0
Editor's Correspondence
September 13, 2010

Specific Elements of Teleintensivist Paradigm Require Additional Scrutiny and Justification

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Inova Health System, enVision eICU, Falls Church, Virginia.


Copyright 2010 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.2010

Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(16):1509-1510. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.297

We applaud McCambridge and colleagues1 for their work regarding the impact of systematic application of telemedicine and a health information technology bundle (HITB) on intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes. In our multihospital health system, we currently use the remote intensivist coverage (RIC) model coupled with several HITB components, and have augmented this with an evidence-based, structured approach to ICU care processes and integrated virtual rounds with bedside nursing staff. The ongoing shortage of intensivists and critical care nurses is almost certain to mandate growth and refinement of ICU telemedicine (tele-ICU) care delivery models such as HITB-RIC.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview