[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.179.146. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Editor's Correspondence
Health Care Reform
January 24, 2011

Where Do Diagnostic Adverse Events Come From?

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Mid-Valley Cardiology, Kingston, New York, and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York.

Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(2):180-181. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.504

I read with interest the article by Zwaan et al1 analyzing the causes of diagnostic adverse events (DAEs). They conclude that “knowledge-based mistakes” were the most common, but I believe that the real issues lie hidden behind the otherwise compelling statistics developed in the article.

We live in a setting where we increasingly see medicine practiced by protocol. That is not to say that compiling best-practice guidelines or evidence-based algorithms are bad, but what it encourages is a lack of “creative thinking” when seeing patients and more of a “cookbook approach.” Couple this with the increasing pressures to see more patients in a shorter period, to get patients out of the hospital faster, and to enforce a conformity of therapy in the name of “comparative effectiveness,” and we see DAEs because practitioners just are not encouraged to think creatively.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×