[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.157.225.99. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 1970

Accuracy of Sphygmomanometers in Hospital Practice

Author Affiliations

Ann Arbor, Mich; Minneapolis

From the Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Drs. Perlman, Chiang, and Keller) and the Laboratory of Physiological Hygiene, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Dr. Blackburn). Dr. Perlman is now with the Department of Medicine, Milwaukee County Hospital, Milwaukee. Dr. Chiang is an International Postdoctoral Research fellow (5 FOJ-TW 1025) of the US Public Health Service.

Arch Intern Med. 1970;125(6):1000-1003. doi:10.1001/archinte.1970.00310060078007
Abstract

Three hundred ten aneroid and 25 mercury sphygmomanometers in hospital use were calibrated against a new mercury manometer standard which properly recorded zero. A total of 68.4% (212 of 310) of the aneroid instruments and all of the mercury instruments were accurate within ± 3 mm Hg tolerance (average of four readings). An average deviation from standard of greater than ± 7 mm Hg was shown by 13.2% (41 of 310) of the aneroid instruments. Significant variation among hospitals in the proportion of accurate aneroid manometers appeared to be related to maintenance procedures. Aneroid sphygmomanometers must be calibrated periodically against a mercury manometer standard with a simple Y-tube connection. Only with careful observation, calibration, and maintenance should aneroid instruments be used in emergency care situations or in scientific studies concerned with indirect blood pressure.

×