[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.94.5. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 1972

Rh Immunization and its Prevention.

Author Affiliations

New York

 

By JC Woodrow. Price, $13. Pp 151, with 30 tables and a few graphs. Williams & Wilkins Co, 428 E Preston St, Baltimore 21202, 1970.

Arch Intern Med. 1972;129(6):1004. doi:10.1001/archinte.1972.00320060152039

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

The injection of concentrated preparations of anti-Rh0 IgG globulin preparations into nonsensitized Rh-negative mothers at the time of the birth of Rh-positive babies has become a routine prophylactic procedure against Rh sensitization. The rationale of its use is that at delivery, due to disruption of the placental barrier, fetal Rh-positive blood is apt to enter the maternal circulation and sensitize her with the result that future Rh-positive babies may be erythroblastotic. Independently, it occurred to Clarke, Finn, and Woodrow in Liverpool and to Freda and Gorman in New York City that the injection of patent Rho antibodies into the mother might prevent the development of isosensitization. The Liverpool group reasoned that the rapid clearing of fetal Rh-positive red blood cells (RBC) from the maternal circulation by the passively administered Rh antibodies might prevent the RBC from reaching antibody forming tissues. Freda and Gorman based their theory on

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×