[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
September 1974

Neurological Examination in Clinical Practice.

Author Affiliations


Arch Intern Med. 1974;134(3):596-597. doi:10.1001/archinte.1974.00320210206037

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


The neurological examination is a time-consuming one, often ignored or omitted, frequently abbreviated and inadequate, or incomplete and misleading. While detailed, it is logical and, when it is performed well and interpreted correctly, it yields important information concerning localization of pathological processes. When it is coupled with a good history, a precise diagnosis or an approach to diagnosis is established.

This book is an attempt to help the clinician elicit and interpret "neurological signs, stressing the traditional neurological approach." As such, it is classical and, like an old friend, reliable and well done. However, it is of limited appeal, being too simple for neurological trainees and not really sufficient by itself for the occasional traveler in neurological problems—he needs additional help in anatomical and clinical correlation not available in this small volume. It is fine for medical students and house officers to read during their first week of a neurological

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview