[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 23.23.54.109. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 1976

Pseudomyeloma: A Separate Entity or a Coincidence?

Arch Intern Med. 1976;136(1):118-119. doi:10.1001/archinte.1976.03630010096023

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor.—  Dr Maldonado and associates (135:267-270, 1975) described three patients with a monoclonal gammopathy and severe osteoporosis resembling multiple myeloma in which no progression to myeloma was observed after three, four, and ten years of observation. This unusual association can be caused by chance alone. However, we have seen recently a patient whose condition fulfilled the criteria of pseudomyeloma and who had an overt myeloma that was observed after 7 1/2 years, which suggests that pseudomyeloma can be the expression of a premyelomatous condition.

Patient Summary.—  A 76-year-old woman was seen in February 1968, with an infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the right breast. She was found also to have a monoclonal spike on serum protein electrophoresis. No Bence Jones protein was demonstrated in the urine. Bone marrow aspiration showed 1% plasma cells and the skeletal roentgenogram disclosed diffuse osteoporosis involving the spine, ribs, and pelvis (Fig 1).

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×